Guyana - Civil Society Speaks

Demand Change

2006-02-26T15:09:00.000-08:00

By Peter R. Ramsaroop

We have recently seen a government official finally talking about VISION for the first time after fourteen years into their administration and now only during an election year. In August 2005, I wrote a column with a similar title in the Kaieteur News. The people have had a significant amount of vision for our nation over the years, but this vision has never been implemented because of resistence by the current administration to making Guyana a better place for the next generation.

We first had the Guyana 21 plan, then the National Development Strategy and my book, Hope for Our Nation, Guyana Vision 2020 and other well thought out plans. During the month of March, I will release an update to my book outlining the implementation plan of the vision (The Road to Eldorado). All of these strategies, when combined, have a common goal of changing the economics, political and social well being of our nation.

A column written by a government official with the titles Vision 1 and 2 is an insult to the numberous well thought out stratagies and a clearly demonstrates of a lack of detailed research on the complexities of implementing a practicable plan that would create a viable legacy for the next generation.

History is the best example of how long the human memory can be. We can sit in our comfortable homes in the 21st century AD and analyse the reign of Julius Caesar who was born in 1st century BC. We have a propensity to over-analyse with the hope of not repeating the same mistakes of those before us.

Does it do any good? If we learn from our past, yes it does a great amount of good. However, if we gaze history full in the face and comprehend the errors of our ancestors without changing, then we only waste our time in studying history.

Guyana’s children study her history every day. They are expected to know the good and the bad so they can identify with the national history that connects every citizen. But will it help them lead the country any better when it is their turn? Did our history lessons help us lead the country better than the generation before us?

This year we will celibrate our 40th year of independence and I have been contemplating the legacy of this generation. I wonder if Guyanese 40 years from now will have a reason to show their appreciation to today’s leaders or if they will use our generation as one more excuse to justify the continuing sad state of the nation. If the latter, then it will surely be a well deserved critique.

Forty years ago Guyana was on the brink of the most potential ever to that point in history. The future held nothing but promise and we were ready to make a beautiful country with our own hands. We had a clean slate and could write our own remarkable history. Unfortunately, there has been nothing remarkable to record in the last 40 years.

Our predecessors failed us and left us with a legacy of racism, dictatorial governance and poverty. Will our legacy be the same?

The issues that plague Guyana have been analysed to death. We have debated, debunked and declared, but we are still defunct, debased and defeated in the eyes of the rest of the world. We need more than the VISION now, we need the measured implementation of the VISION.

We can use the next 40 years to build a substantial and viable legacy and leave our children a country for which they are proud. All it takes is a little initiative and a lot of hard work. There is one more very important factor needed to transform Guyana for the better – direction. We must be willing to step out of our comfort zones and toss the old system in the trash heap where it belongs.

Apathy has been our downfall. This is the first necessary change if we are to see our country develop. The change cannot be in just one or two Guyanese; it must be the entire nation – one strong voice demanding progress and reform.

In unity we can call for a new government, demand a healthy economy and change our country for the better. It is the only way to offer a legacy worthy of the children of Guyana. Even if no one else in the world sees our worth, we still know beyond a shadow of a doubt that we are a strong, intelligent and innovative people. We know we are capable of so much more. The untapped potential in our country is brimming at the rim and just waiting for the opportunity to bubble over into the rest of the world. We are inspired daily by this knowledge – it is what keeps us going.

A myriad of new strategies have been proposed to no avail since none have been implemented – thanks to those who have put us on this crazy merry-go-round in the first place. We go round and round. Someone says, “Stop this merry-go-round and let me off”! The leaders say, “Sure” – as they tell the technician to go even faster.

This is a strategic point in history. We can choose to end this crazy cycle or to allow our children to inherit the same legacy that was passed down to us. Quite frankly, I’m not all that happy with the legacy handed to me and would like to give my children something more valuable; I want a country full of success.

Dare I say there is a better way? It seems there have been countless attempts at creating an economic and political system that actually works for Guyana. Dare we propose a better way to infuse life into our limp economy, new techniques for a stronger infrastructure and a systematic approach at an educational system that will prepare Guyana’s children to be competitive in the career of their choosing regardless of where they live? Not only do we dare, but we ask others to help us as well.

Our non-profit organization VISION (Visionaries Inspiring Success In Our Nation) – continues to be involved in making contributions to our nation through commuinty service, sports and civil advocacy issues.
The dynamics of our country are like none other in the world. We get swept away in an emotional whirlwind every time a politician yells racism. We sit idly by as the government runs our country to their liking with total disregard to what is best for us and what we want.

If we are serious about leaving a pleasing legacy for our children, then we need to start by demanding change right now. There is no more time to wait around for the government to change; they have made it abundantly clear that they see no reason to change at all. But you and I see the reasons every single day.

We see the squalor and the lawlessness. We see the fear in our children’s eyes when they look at the front pages of our newspapers. It is the same fear we lived with daily as we grew up. Every day our headlines scream of death, poverty and an insensitive government. I want to give the children hope and the only way that can happen is if we demand change.

When opportunity meets potential the outcome is dynamic. When an intelligent child is provided a proper education, success is the only expectation. Likewise, when a country brimming with this much potential makes its own opportunities and refuses to be held down anymore by the unseen forces of social and cultural expectation and dictatorial rule, the only outcome is success.

Will you work to make our country better? Can you see the same beautiful Guyana we can be? What legacy do you want to leave the next generation? Guyana, with headlines blaring, awaits our reply.

Are we really Democratic?

2006-02-19T15:07:00.000-08:00

by Peter R. Ramsaroop

A democratic form of government is self-rule by the people through elected representatives who are to ideally enact the will of the people concerning the affairs of the country. In modern society, democracy is the noblest form of government, as well as the most precarious, because its efficaciousness relies solely on the participation of the people.

Democracy is so highly regarded because it refuses to bend a knee to the would-be tyrant or the nepotism of kings and queens. Centuries of harsh rule and maltreatment at the hands of all-powerful lords, certainly initiated and nurtured the desire for self-rule by the people. What started as a primitive form of democracy during the Greek and Roman periods has blossomed into a responsive form of government that is accountable to the people – in theory.

The precarious position of modern democracy is no doubt a direct manifestation of passivity from a people who have forgotten their past. The cruel effects of feudalism and tyranny have been so far removed from our generation that, for many democratic countries, the people no longer possess a healthy fear of what could happen if one strong personality attempts usurpation of power.

The people of our nation, who lack political interest and participation certainly beg one to question the competency of our country's democracy. We lethargically keep note of what our representatives are doing and treat their actions as superfluous and spurious, when indeed those actions are often monumental.

Who is watching the government of Guyana? Who is maintaining a watchful eye on those who decide our fate, the fate of our children and the fate of our country? Should we just naively assume that because a person is elected or appointed to a position of power that he/she will operate responsibly by enacting the will of the people? World history has proven the contrary. Indeed, even our history has proven the contrary.

So many of us have complained that the politicians have not done their part to create a vibrant and thriving Guyana. We feel ripped off and victimized by our government for not accomplishing the tasks we have entrusted to them. Yet honesty demands that we ask ourselves the same question - have we done our part in this process?

When someone is hired for a job, the employer does not assign that person a task without intention of following-up later. In fact, the employer knows that a follow-up will yield better results on the first task and even on later tasks, since the conscientious employee knows to expect the employer's critique. Yet, we the people, have not followed-up on those we have hired to fill the most important positions in our nation. We have filled these positions and simply walked away, then we return a year or two later and criticise the poor performances.

What is our part in the democratic process? Democracy is not just about voting, it is about good goverance, rule of law and free from our corrupt politicans. Apart from voting, we are responsible to follow-up on those we hire to lead our country. We are to be the conscience of their actions, motives and agenda. We are to be informed and play an active role in carefully watching our leaders. We are to let them know when we don't approve of an action and we are to praise them for a job well done. Democracy, by definition, requires the participation of the people or it just does not, nor can it possibly, work.

Let us not be fearful in our voices of dissent at the dictatorial nature of our government in the way they are treating the public servants, the teachers, the people of our nation.

Those in office are to respond to the people; not just to the people that support them or with a business in their interest, but to all people - to the common people. Not just because they have the majority based on ethnic voting patterns that gives them the right to discrimate to those that did not vote for them. They are accountable to the people of Georgetown, as well as to the people of Essequibo, Berbice, Sophia, Buxton - the entire country.

One might ask, “How can these politicians know what the people from these various regions expect?” The answer is easy – the politicians should ask what is expected. This is democracy in action. The ruling politicians have no problem making the rounds during an election year, passing out state funds in sports, newspaper ads, and flood relief to their supportors, but do they truly care about all the people and their interests?

I do not pretend to be ignorant of the immense amount of work involved in being a conscience and active part of the democratic process. It is no small chore to keep a trained eye on those in office, yet that does not relieve us of our duty to do so. This is where the media's role in democracy becomes vital. Balanced and unbiased journalism that is free and independent of government obligation or intervention is the best way to keep the pubic informed and to maintain democracy in its purest form.

By having a state-run television and radio monoply, we are constanly bombarded by propaganda and misinformation. By not allowing any voices of dissent on the radio and TV monopoly, there is not a level playing field to take us into a fair and free elections.

The press is to act as a watchdog for the people. Though they are certainly to watch over many parts of society, their primary responsibility is to keep a constant eye on the government. I have encountered the journalist from the state media who blatenly leaves out major parts of a story thus making it propaganda versus reporting.

However, let me make this abundantly clear: any unnecessary entanglements with the press, for it to serve the people and governmental officials, are a breach of trust. Newspapers that cater to the whims of politicians to garner favour are not to be trusted, and the papers they produce are worth nothing more than to clean up after a dog. Conversely, most newspapers gladly accept their role in society and wear that responsibility as a badge of honour.

The press is only one way to stay informed. There are also many political activist groups formed with the sole purpose of watching the elected officials. The existence of these groups promotes awareness among the people and accountability by the politicians. Though these groups often hold strong notions on certain issues, their presence in the democratic system serves as a powerful deterrent for wrongdoing, because they are usually watching every move of their rival politicians, waiting expectantly for a slip-up.

In the end though, it is your responsibility and mine to watch our leaders through whatever means possible. Democracy cannot work without the follow-up requiring responsiveness and accountability from those whom we have hired to run our nation. It is a beautiful human quality to expect the best from others, including our leaders, but it is simply irresponsible to entrust them to a task and not check up on them regularly.

The disappointment we feel is our own fault and it is time to fix the broken aspects of democracy in Guyana, lest she fall into unsuspecting hands of cruelty.

Human ingenuity and a thirst for freedom forged modern democracy so that all people, the great and the small, have a voice in the affairs concerning themselves. Shall we treat this precious commodity with the same disregard we have toward a long forgotten stained shirt that simply occupies drawer space? Ignorance in this case is not bliss. In fact, ignorance in this case is dangerous and knowledge is our friend.
Guyana had fair and free elections in 1992, but we still have not achieved democracy. Which do you choose? Ignorance at the cost of future democracy - or knowledge which will require your time? Guyana expectantly (awaits) our reply.

The Rule of Fear - Who is Next?

2006-02-05T15:24:00.000-08:00

Peter R. Ramsaroop

I start out this column, by asking every reader; if you want to see peace in our land, free of corruption, free of organised crime, free of economic suppression, pick a HIBISCUS flower near you, regardless of the colour, as an acknowledgement of our diversity and multi-ethnic society. Smell the victory that one day we will have, when we can say to our young children that Guyana has reached its potential, it has crossed the racial divide, it has a government that cares for the people and are servants to society, we are free of death squads, corruption and repression, and finally where all of our people are treated equally, with respect and dignity and allow to prosper in a free society.

This last week, we witnessed the assassination of political activist, Ronald Waddell. Mr. Waddell’s fight against an oppressive government, took many different forms. His killing has brought a chill to political and civil activists, including myself. We realize even more now, that fighting a system and government for the wrongs of society comes with very high prices. The continued death squads whether state sponsored or not still exists. Mr. Waddell’s punishment took many forms, from removal of his talk show, to the order to go before the ERC and the Justice System. I did not agree with all of Mr. Waddell’s methods, but there is no need for this senseless killing that now leaves his family to grieve. My sympathies go out to them.

I have seen the first set of repression on me personally by the government in reference to my business, my property and members of the government and ruling party calling for me to go back from whence I came. I asked the question, who is next? No killings will stop us from advocating for justice and equality and with our fight against corruption.

We must ensure that any fight against government’s oppression is not fought on a racial level, but on principles, values and moral standards. Not because an Afro-Guyanese was wrongfully killed therefore an Indo-Guyanese must pay. We have to prevent at all cost, a repeat of 1964. Any movement towards change must be part of a peaceful revolution for a better Guyana through a fair and free electoral process or a movement of our people to change even the corrupt system first, in order produce a fair and free process.

The health of any democratic state can be measured by the degree to which its citizens feel free to voice their dissent against the government without fear of punishment or reprisal. Guarantees of free speech, free press and free assembly mean absolutely nothing if the people live in fear of retaliation should they choose to speak their minds regarding their politicians.

Oppression comes in many shapes and sizes. It hides its evil motives in the pretences of supposed honourable acts all the while bullying the naysayer into silent submission with unspoken threats of retribution. However, let there be no doubt whatsoever that democracy requires, no demands, dissent.

Free political discussion and the right to disagree with those in political power is the cornerstone of a free country. Without the right to dissent there is no way for the people to unite in thought and purpose regarding the process that decides their lives and futures. When the people are free to discuss their feelings about the government, they have at their disposal the first platform necessary to accept or reject the government and even, if desired, replace the government.

Truly, a responsive government is simply a natural by-product of citizens who do not fear reprisal from disagreeing with their politicians. The will of the people should be the foremost concern of the government and when that will is ignored or denied, the people have a responsibility to voice their dissent and to expect changes in a timely manner.

Any element that creates a political climate that produces a fear in the people to speak their minds is anti-democratic and dictatorial. There are so many avenues by which a government can create such a climate. Some methods are more drastic than others, but the end result is always the same – silencing the voice of the people.

The more aggressive and less apologetic oppressive governments usually choose very public methods to make examples of one dissenter in an effort to curb the disapproving appetite in other would-be dissidents. These methods usually include such atrocities as shutting down a newspaper that has printed dissenting material, sending harassing messages via the media to warn its enemies and even murdering anyone who opposes the government. We have seen this type of behaviour in our dear Guyana over 25 years ago when Dr. Walter Rodney was killed for voicing his dissent of the then administration.

Other less public, yet often just as sinister, methods include social ostracization, yanking of government contracts from businesses ran by political dissenters and, here in Guyana, total disregard for dissent originating from the race that is not in power. Disregarding the views of the “other” race is certainly one highly efficient technique to summarily dismiss a large amount of dissent while further perpetuating the racial division in our country - a division instigated and sustained by vitriolic politicians who would chip away at our democracy for a chance to sit in parliament.

So what is Guyana’s democratic temperature? To what degree do the citizens feel the freedom to voice their dissent? Happening upon a conversation here or there will show there is much political condemnation and the people will talk about it with their friends and acquaintances. However, there is also a noticeable undercurrent of fear that runs deep into the veins of the citizens. Whispers of dissatisfaction and low condemning murmurs consistently fill the streets, doorways and rum shops of our country and fear reigns in the place of freedom.

Perhaps this fear is a result of dreadful memories of what can happen when good men and women like Dr. Rodney speak their minds. Or maybe the fear stems from the idea that we may have a government that hires hit men to take care of its “problems.” Then again, it could be because we own a business that relies on contracts from the government and cannot afford to risk the loss of revenue in exchange for dissenting words. Sadly, the root of this underlying fear is probably all of the above – and more.

True, our newspapers are not being shut down like the papers in Iran were recently for printing a dissenting letter. However, any element in our society that prevents dissent is a serious threat to our freedom. Even more, a society that does not actively facilitate opportunities for dissent is no patron of democracy. A country is not democratic simply because its constitution declares it to be so. There are innate principles that are foundational in the classification of being democratic – one of which is facilitation for the voice of dissent.

How does a country facilitate dissent? In today’s modern world, we have so many new avenues available for free discussion. There are Websites with forums formatted specifically for political discussion. There is also the radio, television and newspapers as a means for expressing dissent. Other avenues include providing town meetings, encouraging the formation of political activist groups and, if a situation requires drastic measures, a petition.

However, the most effectual means by which a country can facilitate dissent is to replace every unresponsive politician with one who better understands the role of a democratic leader. It really is that simple. Such politicians are not fit for the service of the people and should have no place in making decisions that impact the people if they cannot listen to the will of the people.

Further, any politician found to be making threats, even in the slightest degree, that would hamper a healthy climate of dissent, should also be replaced without delay. These leaders seek their own interest and power. They are dangerous and should not be trusted with the honour of running our country since most times this type of person will only run it into the ground and then blame it on someone else.

Beyond doubt, it is extremely difficult to overcome a fear of political reprisal when there is even a small nagging that one’s opposition might bring retribution to family, business or self. However, if the people of Guyana do not take the necessary steps to restore a healthy climate of free discussion to our country, then who will? Quite frankly my fellow compatriots, there is no one else.

With the same mouths we use to kiss our children and eat the sweet fruit of our land, or smell the beautiful Hibiscus flowers, we should be demanding the will of the people and declaring the freedom for political discussion. It is time to exchange our whispers for bellows and our doorways for podiums. I ask for a second time, if not us, then who? Once again, Guyana expectantly awaits your reply.

PPP Squanders even Communist Ideologies

2006-01-29T15:01:00.000-08:00

by Peter R. Ramsaroop

With a communist government in power here in Guyana under the banner of democracy, there has understandably been a level of resistance to certain aspects of a free market economy. Hence, I feel a sense of urgency for the benefit of our nation to investigate the many ways by which Guyana could benefit from establishing a more open market.

I do not believe the government to be even true to communism, in the true sense of the word but more of a dictatorship. The government touts this ideology; however, it stops far short in achieving its proclamation of communism in the distribution of the wealth acquired through the public-owned businesses, taxes and international aid.

This shows that perhaps the PPP/C is only communist in theory, but not in application. If indeed the communist notions of distribution were in fact applied to Guyana , those in the government would not own homes that cost far more than what an average Guyanese could make in his/her life. As a result of this failure to apply core principles of the philosophy of communism, their only option would be to embrace the by-product of communism – dictatorship.

I challenge those in the government to prove their loyalty to the ideas of Marx and Lenin by making their salaries known to the public. Please also include any fringe benefits that are not reported, including any extra money received from the contracts unfairly given out to supporters. If it were found that any person employed by the government is making above the average national wage, then that person's salary should be cut to reflect the same as the rest of Guyana .

Further, the public should also be made fully aware of all personal assets, including homes, cars, jewellery and any other share holdings or possessions. Subsequently, each government employee who claims to be a staunch advocate of communism should be required to liquidate those assets for the good of society.

The monies gained from the decreased governmental salaries and the sales of personal assets would then be used to build a better infrastructure, help curb poverty, pay the police more money and provide better education. I bet the sale of just a couple homes in Pradoville would go a long way toward cleaning up the canals and buying the necessary equipment to prevent further flooding.

I wonder when these same people are no longer in Government, how they would afford these homes and the Prados they drive.

However, if our communist government officials are not so inclined to give up the lifestyle to which they have become accustomed, then perhaps they should consider allowing the rest of the country the opportunity to acquire that same type of lifestyle by introducing a tad more capitalism to the economy to help the government's communism attain some form of life.

Right now, the PPP/C's version of communism has got Guyana on the economic declining line and, from what I see, there does not seem to be any hope of resuscitation in the near future.

If the government does not want to take me up on this challenge to truly follow the letter of the law concerning the communism they are so proud to profess, then perhaps they would be more willing to consider the following information.

Let us first consider the recent tax modifications of the newly proposed budget. At this point, it seems the government intends to compensate for the taxes lost by omitting a larger portion of the population obligated to pay taxes (an additional 20,000 people of whom make less than $25,000/mo) by increasing what must be paid by the taxable portion of the nation to a flat rate of 33.3 percent.

Would it not be logical then to earnestly strive for a larger portion of taxable incomes? This logic would maintain that the more people who are making a hefty income, the more taxes that will be collected. The more taxes being collected, the more money the state has to allocate to such projects as the canals, education, crime, roads and the like.

At this point, there is very little action on behalf of the government to encourage local entrepreneurialism or to attract foreign investors.

It is therefore only reasonable to assume that, if Guyana were indeed allowed to experiment in a truly free market economy, the poor would reap the benefits of the success of their countrymen through jobs, yes, but also through the increased taxes brought in from the increased incomes.

This is exactly how countries like China and the U.S. are able to maintain their modern and advanced infrastructures. This is also how such nations are able to provide for single mothers, the terminally ill and the mentally ill. It is through the taxes collected from the more wealthy portions of society.

In fact, the progressive tax rate in the U.S. currently tops at 35 percent, just a little more than the flat tax proposed last week by Guyana's Government; however, there are far more in the U.S. who fall into this bracket because of the free market economy, therefore there is far more money brought in through taxes for the good of the entire nation.

Further, there are some in both the U.S. and in China who make millions (in U.S. dollars) in taxable income. So in these free markets or in China's case, market socialism, which is a combination of the advantages of a free market in terms of economic efficiency with those of socialism, there are more contributors to the state revenue and therefore a substantial amount more of money to use for the good of the society.

In its current state, Guyana has so little because cumbersome bureaucracy and burdensome trade levies slow economic growth in all business sectors. It is not immoral to want to make money or to have money. In fact, it is more immoral to neglect the poor that could be helped if only there were money to do it and it is wrong to withhold decent education from our children simply because the state cannot afford to pay its teachers, so they all run to other shores that will pay them.

It is immoral to allow crime to torment our communities as we wallow in the self-pity of poverty simply because the government says their communist agenda is moral.

I see nothing at all moral about the miserable state of our country. In fact, I see the blatant immorality of those who would refuse its citizens the opportunities that are enjoyed by so many others throughout the world – and which is in fact enjoyed by most of those in that government.

Presently, Guyanese work hard for very little – this ought not be. All Guyanese should be afforded a real chance to work hard and create a prosperous life for themselves and their children, without regard to political preference. All Guyanese should be given the opportunity to go home to a nice house, just like their government officials do.

We all deserve the right to maintain our homes without fear of flood or thieves, or senior government officials ordering destruction of our property. These are luxuries enjoyed by those who live in countries who value innovation and entrepreneurialism. In Guyana, these important ideals are scorned and in the process, our nation is left breathless with exasperation and reduced to beggary, as we wait for the next handout in aid from the very countries we treat with contempt because they have what we want – the opportunity at a better life.

If God helps those who help themselves, then it is high time that as a nation, we start to demand a free market that will create the opportunity for us to help ourselves.

Finally, Peeping Tom's Column in Kaieteur News on Thursday 26 th questioned my comments on the amount of money it took to fill a swamp behind my house ($3 million). A few years ago, the Government did some minor repairs to State House, the cost was $99 million. A major contractor was given a contract to build a new school building for Tutorial High to the tune of over $300 million. Another prominent contractor fixed a few kokers and said that he spent $1.4 billion. City officials received $50 million from the distributor of Government money. The President of Guyana, and, in my opinion, has not shown what was accomplished for the money spent.

This last Christmas, the President distributed cheap dolls and toys in Sophia. When a reporter asked the Permanent Secretary about the cost; she shrugged her shoulders and said "about $5 million.” It is reported that there are millions of dollars spent on trips to New York by government officials and their companions, local and foreign. These trips include expenditures at establishments such as the Avalanche Club and include the high costs of club ‘activities.' Why isn't Peeping Tom questioning the expenditures of these funds instead of questioning a private citizen's spending pattern?

A Revolution for Equality & Justice

2006-01-22T14:46:00.000-08:00

By Peter R. Ramsaroop

My column last week “Elections 2006 – The Will of the People, Not of a Party” came under heavy criticism from the agency (GECOM) set up to deliver a fair and free election to the people of Guyana. Everyday, it is becoming obvious that the necessary requirements for us to have the environment where we can truly have such an election will not be in place by the mandated constitutional date.

This last week, we read the full-page advertisement from ACDA, calling for all Afro-Guyanese not to go to the polls. They give ten reasons for this call. I am a full believer in us exercising our democratic right to vote, but given the current system where constitutional changes recommended have not been completed, an election list that is being challenged by the combined opposition and many in civil society, and a system that allows the ruling party to exploit some segments of the population and marginalise another, one can then understand why sections of our society are so skeptical. It is not enough for the Government and some members of the GECOM or even the international community to be satisfied with the process, democracy requires that the process manifestly convey an appearance of fairness to all the citizens of our nation.

It should be noted that many of the points posited by ACDA’s message are applicable to Guyanese across all racial and ethnic boundaries. Every group in this country is entitled to an assurance that elections will bring freedom and democracy, and not more of the same. I also submit to you that every distinct group in Guyana faces and is paying the cost of inequitable distribution of rights and resources.

A close advisor to me said, while he feels that ACDA ostensibly proffers arguments on behalf of the Afro-Guyanese Population, the plight of smaller Guyanese minority groupings, given the current electoral system and voting pattern, is even more grim. It is doubtful that an Amerindian or Portuguese or Chinese child, if questioned on his or her aspirations, could even remotely harbor the illusion that they could grow up and become President of their nation. That's a sad indictment of our political process.

ACDA’s other points bring little argument from many of us. “Elections as they are presently constituted will not give us the political space to compete economically and otherwise”. Not when significant segments of the population perceive that they are being shunted to the fringes of the society. We have to create conditions in this country where people have a reasonable expectation of peace and security and justice, and also confidence that the means of production and distribution will operate in a fair and balanced fashion, making economic parity a natural destination for most. This should not be the hope for some of us. It should the goal of all of us whose hearts pulsate with a yearning for the time when we can sit and witness the disbelief in the eyes of our grandchildren as we relate what these times were like.

ACDA has advanced a position it feels that those on whose behalf it speaks, are entitled to take. Yes, there are many who will be critical of this position. One can reasonably suggest that abstaining from participation in the electoral process might not be the soundest of strategies at this time. However, we all are looking at the situation through prisms that are determined by our economic state, our political affiliations, and yes, even our race.

Based on comments in the media it is clear that there are portions of our society with no links to ACDA or the PNCR who also feel that another win for the PPP would give legitimacy to the divisive authoritarianism to which the present constitutional framework and voting patterns gives rise. There are some who define this authoritarianism as bordering on being semi fascist, a frightening progression to contemplate. When a political entity becomes assured of its electoral prospects by virtue of a racial relationship with the majority, there are few disincentives for it to consider or take into account the concerns of the opposition or anyone else who disagrees with them.

Look at the situation with the State Media, a veritable mouthpiece for the ruling party. Stella Ramsaroop, on overseas-based columnist, recently lamented over the PNC’s inaction during the floods even though she admitted that she could be wrong. The issue was not the PNC’s inaction but the fact that the state media completely ignored the flood relief efforts and activities of the main opposition party.

In the midst of a disaster when Guyanese of all stripes are inundated with water due to neglect of the drainage systems, the ruling party opted to play politics with media instruments of the state. This is the kind of attitude and behavior that must have been foremost in the mind of Lord Acton when he coined the phrase, “power corrupts and absolute power tend to corrupt absolutely”. It appears that the government has paid out money to the residents of the flood-affected communities prior to telling them that they have to intentionally flood their communities again. I submit that is the CON of 2006.

It should also be noted that Tain did not erupt because the residents living there wanted to have fun in the streets. It erupted because they perceived their situation to be insecure and not receiving the kind of attention it should from a State Agency, to wit, Law Enforcement. I would also recommend to anyone who did not look at what the state media showed during the fake arrests in Buxton to do so. That is more of a treason charge than the definition of the same as it is currently portrayed.

Let’s not also forget the major injustice we experienced just this past week regarding the proposed amendment of the Trade Union Congress. This is a dictatorial attempt to interfere with democracy and the rights of union workers and validates the autocratic rule of our government.

Given we are a major crossroad of our nation transition into the global 21st Century, we the people, must bond together in a revolutionary way in order to fight for justice and equality from a system that openly subscribes to “If you are not with us, then you are against us.” Maybe it is time for a caretaker government versus an undertaker regime.

Let’s stand up and be counted. Let’s get it right once and for all. Let’s put the systems in place where we can exercise our democratic right to vote, not a system where the term democracy is abused by the cover-up of racism, marginalisation, and authoritarian actions.

ELECTIONS 2006 – The Will of the People, Not of a Party

2006-01-15T16:15:00.000-08:00

By Peter R. Ramsaroop

A free, fair and transparent process for this year's elections is of paramount importance to the voting population of Guyana. In 2006, we are looking forward to exercising our democratic right to vote for many reasons, including finally bringing an end to the rule of communist ideologies that have stagnated Guyana's entrance into the 21 st Century. Many countries in Europe and other parts of the world have already taken this bold step in order to revitalise their poor economies. This year, Guyana will hopefully follow in their footsteps. We, the people, must ensure that the incompetent or corrupt leaders are not allowed to continue to contribute to the ruin of our beautiful nation.

In order to have successful elections, or even elections at all, it is imperative that GECOM ensures that the necessary preparations for elections are met before the constitutional date of elections in August. In this column, I will discuss some of the essential elements that GECOM needs to be focused on and the rewards for success or the consequences of failure.

The Official List of Electors must be accurate and trustworthy. There should be continuous and simple registration exercises to add new voters to the list. Adding complexity and inefficiencies to the registration process only serves to frustrate new voters and deter them from registering to vote. This list should also be free of names of deceased persons and others who are no longer qualified to vote. I believe that there needs to be a verification process using some form of Biometrics and house-to-house validation .
The Official List of Electors by region should be printed and ready for distribution. Claims and objections should be processed efficiently and without greatly inconveniencing the voters.
There should be printed Election Manuals and trained, capable election workers who are ready and able to perform their tasks. A Voter Education programme should be ready for implementation. Voter Identification Cards should be printed and ready for distribution to all qualified voters. These cards should be delivered safely to all qualified voters.
The Media Code of Conduct recently signed by media owners, practitioners, talk-show hosts and others should be followed without fail. All contesting political parties and candidates should also sign a Code of Conduct and their nominations should be checked and approved.
Polling places should be identified in all regions and contracts effected for their use. These polling places must be made fully functional with needed materials and equipment. Methods for counting ballots and security systems should be tested and in place.
Communication is a key element during the elections. Systems for communication within all regions and a headquarters should be tested and operational.
Finally, the system for disseminating election results to the public should be designed, tested and in place. In other words, all elections systems, procedures, logistics and operations must be tested and ready for implementation.

I believe if these items are not efficiently executed, Guyana will risk being thrown into a constitutional crisis for the first time in our history. The result of such a crisis is unknown. However, Parliament would have been dissolved, and we will have to work on the possibility of a caretaker government. This potential crisis should be sufficient pressure on GECOM to continue to act in the best interest of Guyana. Waiting until a few months before the mandatory date to complete these significant requirements has caused many questions to be raised by contesting parties and the media.

We must ensure the electoral process is sound and measurable. We must also encourage greater public understanding of the process. GECOM's work programme should now focus on the mix of critical concrete products or deliverables.

In November, The Coalition of Parties (GTF) said that they were convinced that there were two important benefits to be derived from GECOM setting indicative dates by which the deliverables would be produced. First, the dates would enable systematic monitoring of GECOM's efforts to accomplish specific targets in a timely manner. Second, whenever deadlines appear to be threatened, early corrective action would be identified and decisions would be taken by GECOM with the support of donors, political parties either individually, or collectively, and by the inputs of other stakeholders.

These deliverables being efficiently accomplished and measured should be the desire of all parties that are planning on contesting the elections. Those parties who seem disinterested in the process should answer for their complacency.

Historically, when the people of a nation demand change, it is as a result of a common consensus that their best interests have not been the primary consideration of the current administration and that it is time for a change.

Most Guyanese will acknowledge that something has to change within our nation. It is time to find our strength in the commonalities we share to build a strong and cohesive force by which to demand these changes. We need a common rallying point. What will rally our nation to stand together as one people? Perhaps “We Guyanese” can realise, for our nation to move forward, we must create the system in which all people feel they have representation with a government that is accountable to the people.

Let's reflect on the fact that our President is on a spending spree, seemingly to buy votes by race. We, as a people, cannot sit back and just comment on it, we must act. I have personally invested in our football program and support youth programs. However, I have to wonder why 20 million dollars was donated to football clubs when police wages or teacher's wages are not being increased.

With the mighty thunder of our voices, the resolve of our determination, the strength of our will, the support of our families overseas and the fervour of our young generation, we, as Guyanese, will take back our country. We will overcome. Guyana, our precious Guyana, awaits our triumph. Our country will settle for nothing less than free, fair and transparent elections. One that we can be confident truly reflects the will of the people.

Recognising our need for the Diaspora

2006-01-08T17:14:00.000-08:00

by Peter R. Ramsaroop, MBA

Regardless of where someone is presently residing, they are forever linked to their land of birth through the burial of their ancestors or through inheritance (be it language, attitudes, customs, habits etc). The Guyanese Diaspora embodies this linkage yet it seems as if many of us here at home have lost sight of this. Quite clearly, there is only a limited consideration for the historical and/or political issues that resulted in the creation of our large Diaspora over the past 40 years.

Recently, we have seen a move by the Coalition of Parties/Civil Society (Third Force) and also the PNCR emphasising the need for the Diaspora's involvement in Guyana. I whole-heartedly support this concept. In 2000, the REFORM released a strong position paper on this subject. I have included parts of this position paper in this column.

During the 1970s and 80s, Guyana was caught up in an international political tug-of-war, due to, among other things, poor governance, ideological dogma and to its non-aligned posture - a status that was not chosen by the general Guyanese public. Nevertheless, this posture resulted in pressures that had direct economic consequences on the average citizen. As a result, many Guyanese exited our shores.

After Dr. Cheddi Jagan was elected as our President in 1992, there was a short-lived movement calling for the return of the Diaspora. However, since the death of Dr. Jagan, we have once again seen a mass exodus, as the nation has endured negative economic growth under the present administration.

Although most of the Guyanese who left in the 70s/80s did so as refugees escaping political turmoil and economic ruin, their unexpected viability and success in other places were responsible for them developing the ability to return home to make a difference for all - especially for those who were unable to leave. The general desire of the Diaspora is to help the general population of their fellow Guyanese to regain the collective pride of achievement that would come from turning the country around.

Unfortunately, their desire to do so appears to be demonised by various acts from the Government and even Parliament. These acts have marginalised the numerous “sons and daughters” of Guyana who have been ambassadors worldwide of Guyana's ability to provide high-calibre performers to the global community who can use their knowledge, ability, experience, networks and resources in helping Guyana to find a meaningful place in the “global village.”

The overall impression is that there are those in Government would like to see overseas counterparts “suffer a little” at home before being allowed to contribute meaningfully whether its in business or politics. This mood has crept into other aspects of society including the media.

Kaieteur News columnists and respected Guyanese human rights activist Freddie Kissoon has recently brought to light the issue of the Government imposing a Vice-Chancellor of its own liking on U.G. against the protests of the University wishes. I addressed this subject in a past column on September 04, 2005. This controversy has taken on a racial twist, and I should note that any proof of racially motivated decisions will never receive my support.

However, controversy concerning a UG Vice-Chancellor is nothing new to Mr. Kissoon. Five years ago, Mr. Kissoon commented that he does ‘not agree with the policy of bringing a Vice-Chancellor from abroad to head U.G.' (The Moral Issue of Staying here to face the music can't be ignored, Stabroek News Letter to the Editor, 18-Jan-01). In other words, the fact that a Guyanese has lived abroad has more importance in his mind than the superior qualifications and experience that he or she may bring along.

Hence, the worldwide trend towards globalisation and the creation of a “global village” seems to have gone unnoticed by Mr. Kissoon, John Mair – (Bill Cotton/Reform), Roy Paul, and others, due to the perceived need for insulation from the Diaspora.

Since my first return to Guyana in 1999, I have been told the statement “we do not do it that way in Guyana” many times by senior Government officials and prominent businessmen and women. This statement has the side effect of legitimising a common belief that overseas-trained Guyanese are too “out of touch” with Guyana to be able to contribute meaningfully to the various sections of modern national development. The obviously ridiculous nature of that notion shocks thinking persons at home and abroad, especially when one considers that Guyanese experts are assisting in the modern development of countries all over the globe.

It must be appreciated that Guyanese are a highly motivated group, oriented towards achievement, willing and capable of making the necessary sacrifices to succeed. The desire to return home and participate at the leadership level in Guyana's development is a natural consequence of Guyanese being Guyanese in the best sense of the word.

South Africa is a good example. During Apartheid, many South Africans were forced into exile. These individuals were spread over many countries in Africa, Europe and in the USA. There, they were able to educate themselves. When apartheid was removed, those, such as Nelson Mandela, who stayed at home, warmly welcomed them.

Today, South Africa has a President, who was a member of the Diaspora for several years of his adult life in President Mbeki. Other returning souls also run many of the new businesses and hold a significant amount of high governmental positions.

Likewise, Guyana needs the Diaspora to move our country forward. Who would be better equipped to shoulder this great responsibility than Guyanese sons and daughters who have proven their abilities in the global marketplace? The advantages are obvious: they are already attuned to Guyana's climate, diet and culture; they would be sympathetic to the overriding goal of nation-building; and they would be more inclined to invest energies beyond the call of duty as they strive with greater levels of zeal than non-Guyanese equivalents.

It seems self-defeating to alienate this immense pool of human resources comprising an unfathomable array of skills and knowledge.

By discouraging the Diaspora, Guyana places itself in the position of having to depend more and more on non-Guyanese experts and consultants. This has the pride-eroding effect of making us into supplicants to “developed” countries.

Any attempt to restrict these natural inclinations of the Diaspora in their love of their country and their desire to see it prosper should be perceived as an attack against Guyanese character and consciousness. We need to distance ourselves from the current administration's approach to the Diaspora.

I appeal to all in the Diaspora to not give up on our nation. We need your assistance in developing a prosperous nation free of crime and corruption. We need your help to thrust Guyana into the global stage of the 21 st century.

2006 - The Year of The People's Revolution

2006-01-01T17:10:00.000-08:00

Peter R. Ramsaroop, MBA

This year we are faced with what many are calling the most critical decision our nation has ever faced. A return of the PPP/C this year will most likely take us into a dictatorship state and closer to a movement towards the leftist front that has been sweeping across Latin America.

We know regardless of race politics, Guyanese want a free and prosperous society. However, we see indications of the creeping dictatorship all over our land. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent on contracts with little or no results and the President has been doling out multiple millions of dollars as Father Christmas in an attempt to buy the votes for 2006.

Rightfully so, the PPP feels an extreme urgency to frantically appease the forlorn citizens who are coming to terms with the fact that they have just wasted another five years of the nation’s history on another subpar government. However, there is only so much money the PPP can dispense and when the well runs dry, their incompetence will remain.

The brain drain continues to steal our intellectuals away to foreign shores because the local economy is so unfortunate. Meanwhile, our borders remain indifferent to the trickle of foreign investors who may have an interest in our country, thereby rejecting the very ones who could help infuse life into our economy and retain the intellectuals with hopeful jobs.

Moreover, we are fraught with a weak opposition who tabled a 2000 National Development Strategy Plan in Parliament and received an astonishing unanimous vote to accept from the PPP/C. How could a 2000 plan without being looked at in detail be presented to Parliament? What happened in the last six years? Is it really possible for a Parliament to squander and entire term in office?

We all know President Carter said he was extremely disappointed with the PPP/C for not implementing a plan he funded and he does not plan to return to Guyana. Imagine where Guyana could have been if the plan had been implemented in 2000. Though there is no reason to cry over spilt milk now, there is plenty of reason to be on the hunt for some capable leaders.

I truly hope we do not allow these same politicians to govern us for the next five years.

We the people must now step out; the only question that remains is what we want. History has proven that unless the people want change, it will never happened. If we are satisfied with the current collective quality of life and enjoy things just the way they are, then nothing needs to change. However, if we are unsatisfied with our current state after allowing the PPP a good amount of time to improve the nation, then it is time for us to make our move.

We have three choices, we can do nothing; we can attempt to do the same thing with more intensity; or we can do it differently. If we do nothing then we can expect nothing. If we continue to do the same thing, then we can expect the same results. Our clear choice is to seek out a different strategy that will rely on qualified leaders who have the gumption to push our nation into the next phase of progress.

The term revolution may send a chill up the backs of some politicians, but we the people want a better Guyana and we are simply tired of the proroguing excuses. We are tired of being used by the government. We are ready to stand up for what is right for our country.

We are also ready to demand a high standard of decency from our leaders. For those who remember the police going into Buxton and arresting 130 males, do you also remember what NCN aired on the television? They did not show a single arrest, but angry women wanting their kinfolk back. I wonder what message they were trying to send. Answer that question for yourself.

We cannot allow the continued monopoly of radio and state media and we cannot allow our tax dollars to be wasted by corrupt politicians. In short, we simply cannot continue to have an incompetent government. They have forgotten what it is like to live without food and the necessities of life. They have forgotten how difficult it is to grow a business in a country that has little money to spend. They have forgotten the people who put them in office. They have forgotten Guyana.

Let’s stand up for our rights as people; it is our democratic privilege and our responsibility as citizens. We cannot allow Guyana to turn into a dictatorship once again. This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever we grow weary of the existing government, it is our Constitutional right to replace it.

Though we grow weary of our government, we cannot become wearisome in our faith that Guyana does indeed have a future. If we lose heart and falter, then surely our dejected nation will once again plummet into the troughs of tyranny. We cannot lose our will to fight for a better tomorrow, for if we do, we will have sentenced our children to a lifetime of misery and sorrow.

We must protect our republic from every ruse that would subjugate us to one person or one party. We should not give the government a reason to order army troops into our streets, and even more so - Venezuelan Army Troops. Let’s first show we can change our nation by a revolution of our votes. Our hearts are strong and our cause is noble; we can take Guyana back and set it on a course for which we can all be proud.

As we cry out to God for the wisdom and strength to make the right decisions concerning our leaders in 2006, I pray that our hearts burn with the courage we need to stand against those who would try to impose their wills on us. It is the will of the people that will prevail this year – for we know best what our own country needs. Happy New Year.

Our Christmas Wish

2005-12-25T19:47:00.000-08:00

In this article, I have summarised some of my columns into one so the readers can examine the content to see if any or all of the issues we have talked about are on your Christmas wish list for a better Guyana.

In my new book, to be released in late January, "Road to El Dorado - The People's Revolution," I have outline a possible road map. In next week’s column, I will release a preview and hopefully we all can include portions of it our New Year resolutions.

Early on in this column we touched on the very important issue of an engaged citizenry. We are a free people of a democratic nation and as such, we alone decide the political fate of our leaders and we can blame no one but ourselves for the state of Guyana. Yet each election year we fall into the same trap contrived by leaders who would divide our country in their quest for political power.

They recklessly cry racial partiality and our typical knee-jerk response is just as reckless. We are better than this. We are more decent and have more wisdom than to play into their dangerous games of vilifying one race over another.

Our insatiable thirst for responsive leaders has increasingly become more desperate with each year since our independence and is now culminated in a people who are disengaged, disenchanted and disheartened about their fair Guyana.

Though we are still just an adolescent country, it is quite clear that future history is calling upon our generation to carry the burden of defining the standards by which our country shall thrive. Is an engaged citizenry on your Christmas list this year?

I have seen several letters in the dailies lately addressing the loss of morality that seems to be taking a toll in our nation. We have touched on the topic of the moral fabric of our society in this column as well.

As citizens we have sat idly on the sidelines and watched as our children have become accustomed to riots in the streets and racial segregation in the government. We have simply sat by and accepted these types of incidents as being a normal course of events, when in reality they are nothing short of a national moral tragedy.

The highly regarded philosopher John Stuart Mill once said, “The general tendency of things throughout the world is to render mediocrity the ascendant power among mankind.” Mediocrity has long been the acceptable attitude for many Guyanese.

A single individual can also feel overwhelmed - like there is nothing he or she can do to change the state of our country. However, the question should not be “Should I try?” or “Why should I try?” The question each Guyanese is obliged to ask them self is “How can I not try?”

We have allowed mediocrity to rule in our hearts and as a consequence, instability has ruled our nation. Any type of growth, whether political, social or economical, has not only been stunted in the wake of our indifference, but has fallen into sad disrepair. Fortunately, all is not lost for we can still be repaired.

If the people of Guyana rise up to their moral and civic responsibilities as citizens, we can ensure a future of hope for our children and for their children. This is our country and it is time to reclaim it by asserting our responsibilities to each other as friends, neighbours, business associates and fellow countrymen. Is a resurgence of a high moral standard on your Christmas list today?

Each of us alone might feel like this task is overwhelming, but together - through teamwork – we can create a new Guyana. The more of us that are moving toward this noble goal, the better our chances are of achieving success. The larger our team, the more ways there are to help get Guyana on a road to recovery.

Let’s gather all of the brainpower we can muster, and when we have done that, let’s then borrow even more brainpower, because even though we the task may seem daunting and the issues insurmountable, we are still all Guyanese with a vision.

Now is the time to gather all visionaries from across the nation together, regardless of race or former political affiliation. Our focus should be to move forward and we cannot - we must not – fail. We need to check our proverbial compasses and make sure we are all going in the same direction. Have you wished for a government that knows the definition of teamwork for Christmas this year?

Together we can march as one people to take back our country from criminal forces and scheming politicians. We can rip our nation from the boney grip of poverty. Fear is nothing new to the Guyanese people, yet we hold out and hope for a brighter day; however, a passive wish will not make the fear go away.

If we truly want to be free from fear and want, there is so much that needs to be changed – but the change starts with you and me first. Our hopes can be realised and our dreams can come true, if we take up the task of reforming our country’s political system with our own hands. Is a prosperous new year for Guyana what you wish to get for Christmas?

If so, then we need to empower some bold leaders from all walks of life who are qualified and optimistic men and women with the courage of their convictions and the vision to lead our nation to greatness. Guyana’s problems are many and complex. Hence, we need goodwill, good laws, good men and women and good resolve.

Most of all, we need to work to truly solve our problems and replace the rule of moral chaos with that of order and direction. It is easy to propose laws. Sometimes it is easy to pass laws. But the measure of our seriousness is enforcing the law. This is where Guyana’s severe lack of strong and bold leadership becomes obvious.

Our hope does not lie in the reliance on status quo leaders who curtsy to the whims of the elite. We need leaders who have the internal fortitude to turn away from the temptations of power. We need leaders who seek national interests over personal interests. We need bold leaders who govern with compassion and wisdom. Is strong leadership in Guyana what you want from Santa?

As I read in the papers about what people wanted for Christmas this year, I was struck by how many said they wanted less crime. This is a clear demonstration of how selfless Guyanese are – and how much they want to see a healthy nation. Here’s hoping that Santa is good to Guyana this year and brings us each of these Christmas wishes. Let us remember though, that this is the day when Jesus Christ was born. God Bless You. Merry Christmas.

Peace on Earth, Goodwill Toward Men

2005-12-18T19:45:00.000-08:00

This is a joyous time of the year when goodwill is distributed in hefty proportions. Christmas lights strung generously throughout the city bring out the awe and wonder in each of us. Families will forgive the grievances and harsh words from loved ones and gather together to share meals and swap presents.

There truly is something absolutely wonderful about this time of the year. It has an almost magical quality that unites the staunchest foes and helps the weariest souls. With this magical feeling in the air, with its light and heady sensation, it becomes so easy to see how all Guyanese could come together in unity as well.

In my column last Sunday, I made a very simple call for a teamwork approach in building a unified Guyana . It was not an original thought, but was simply an echo of many voices of Guyanese everywhere who know that a united Guyana has the potential to be a force in this region and in the world.

This particular column has drawn the attention of those who seem to want to continue to divide Guyana to fit their own agenda. However, I will not be discouraged and will continue to echo the call for a unified Guyana . In the spirit of the season, this is the perfect time for us to consider the benefits of coming together as one people for the future of our nation.

Jesus is quoted as saying in Luke 11:17 that “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and a house divided against a house falls” (NKJV). When we look out of our windows, we see a Guyana that has been brought to desolation especially in light of the potential that we all know lies within these borders.

It is clear that Guyana is still a “house divided”, and every Guyanese knows what the outcome will be because we have our past as a reminder. My aim has been and will remain a call for unity, not further division as some would like to assume. There is no reason to assign another motive to this aspiration when I am being very open about what it is I wish to see – unity.

Mahatma Ghandi led a revolution in his country to bring unity in India and to gain its independence. His revolution of course was a non-violent one, but was very effective in uniting India and changing the mentality of its people to believe they could be a strong nation if they united – and he was right.

As we pray for peace on Earth this holiday season, perhaps we should start by praying for peace in Guyana . Surely this weary nation deserves a break from the fear that comes from crime and corruption. Surely we deserve an end to the decades of division that stirs violence and hatred.

Goodwill starts at home and, although we are quick to gather money to send to the victims of the Tsunami or of an earthquake, we seldom see that same goodwill being shared among our own countrymen and women. There is certainly nothing wrong with opening our hearts to our neighbours so we can all share some of our own Peace and Goodwill.

The love and joy that surrounds us during this time of year can bring us together, can help us forgive the past, and help us believe for a better future. However, it is up to us to make this feeling last beyond the holiday season to create a lasting movement of unity.

This truly is the most wonderful time of the year and, if we can look into our own hearts and make the necessary adjustments, we can make the entire next year wonderful too, and the year after that, and the year after that. It really is just a matter of believing there is something better than what we currently have, and moving forward to achieve it.

As you sit around the table with your friends and family this season, gathered in love with joy bubbling over and children smiling, remember the rest of your country and try to wish them some love, joy and peace too.

This world already has plenty of cynics. Guyana has its share of jaded misanthropists, too. In fact, it has more than its share of these types of people, along with plenty of divisive rabble-rousers who seek their own interests and agendas over the good of the nation.

We could use a healthy dose of peace and goodwill to counteract the evil and selfishness. Unity always comes with a price. That price is always the same – compromise. It does not make a person weak to give a little here and there for the sake of goodwill. In fact, it makes us all stronger and unites us all when we compromise.

When we set aside our own agendas for the greater good, it is a clear demonstration that we love something else more than ourselves. In this case, it would be Guyana . The more Guyanese who can share their goodwill through the holiday season and into the next year, the stronger our nation becomes.

In the end, the sacrifice we make to compromise our own agenda is worth the effort if it means we create a unified nation that is ready to transform its political landscape so that it can transform its economic landscape.

The magic of this season creates an almost tangible awareness of peace and goodwill. That is the beauty of faith and hope. But this magic does not have to stop on December 26; it can – and should - be taken right into the New Year. The faith and hope can live on if we allow ourselves to believe.

I don't have visions of sugar-plum dancing in my head right now; instead I have a clear vision of a unified people standing together, not as a third force, but as The Force that will bring long-lasting peace and goodwill to our nation.

Teamwork: A Necessity of Building a New Political Culture

2005-12-11T12:33:00.000-08:00

By Peter R. Ramsaroop

There are so many good men and women out there who really want to help turn Guyana into the thriving country we all know it can be. Many of these individuals have worked tirelessly for years to fight for the people of Guyana.

Recently several smaller groups came together to form a partnership with the hope of building a group that could be a viable opponent against the nation’s entrenched political culture. In fact, two significant new parties have been formed with this goal in mind.

As with any grouping of humans, there are always going to be personality conflicts, value differences and varying strategies on how a goal should be accomplished. Every partnership should be aware of the various factors that could impede successful teamwork.

For example, egotism inhibits the development of a cohesive team. People may start to work together, but as soon as they realise they may not in charge, the teamwork disappears. This is true in all avenues of leadership, whether it is social, political or business partnerships – and such is the case with these new political parties.

At times it seems nearly impossible to surmount the daunting obstacles that stand in the way of building a contemporary political force in Guyana that is people centric, accountable and ready to transform this nation.

However, I am convinced that if there is to ever be a force that can stop the incessant rule of the ingrained political culture, all of these various individuals, groups and forces must come together and work as a team toward this one common, honourable goal.

There is no doubt that Guyana is at a crucial fork in road and the decision made in the next elections will determine a path that can either move the nation forward into a promising future or allow it to take the final steps to complete deterioration.

That is why it is so important that all of these various “new force” factions find a way to work together for the good of the country. We need to build a strong unified coalition to show the people that we care more about Guyana than we do about our own separate agendas.

Woodrow Wilson once said, “We should not only use all the brains we have, but all that we can borrow.” This concept should be applied to the current state of the various third force parties. Separately, we may achieve minimal success, but together we have the potential to attain the ultimate goal, the complete dethroning of the PPP.

At this point, we cannot – and should not – allow egos and personality conflicts to cause us to loose sight of the vision. We have a responsibility to the nation to put ourselves aside and focus on winning as many seats as possible in the next election.

That said, there are also other factors that can create obstacles for any group that is trying to work together toward the same goal. Value differences often present difficulties in the fusion of the team, but these difficulties do not have to be deal breakers.

Another great quote on leadership is by Bud Wilkinson, who said, “If a team is to reach its potential, each player must be willing to subordinate his personal goals to the good of the team.” I truly believe there are times when the ultimate goal should take precedence over the smaller individual goals of the separate entities.

However, there are also certain values that must be championed by the third force parties, such as the inclusion of all racial groups in the newly developing political culture. There should only be one race in Guyana – the human race.

No one in Guyana should be marginalize. To continue the insanity of following the same flawed perceptions that have created a political climate of separatism and elitism is nothing less than nationally sadistic.

We all need to realise that the woes of the past should not be carried into today’s politics. Racial politics should not be accepted in any group. Any party that says they will not work with Afro-Guyanese that belong to an existing party should not be allowed to campaign – and vice versa.

If the new parties are not willing to separate themselves from the old political culture in this regard, then there really is no reason whatsoever to even waste our time with new these endeavours.

However, together with a common goal of a better Guyana – a Guyana with no marginalisation and no elitism – we can unify the nation and win back the future for our children. Those that keep one foot in the old and try one foot in the new needs to realize you either need both feet to walk or the other foot will be stuck in the old mud.

In his book “The 17 Indisputable Laws of Teamwork,” John Maxwell said, “The difference between two equally talented teams is leadership.” Let there be no mistake, the long-standing political culture in Guyana is a formidable opponent. If there is any hope at winning Guyana’s future, it is through unified teamwork with selfless group leadership.

Maxwell also said, “Where there is a will, there is a way; where there’s a team, there’s more than one way.” Guyana cannot afford for the third force parties to allow their egos and personal agendas to get in the way of the ultimate goal.

Now is the time to gather all visionaries from across the nation together, regardless of race or former political affiliation. Our focus should be to move forward, not to take ten steps back by falling into the trap of elitism.

Our common opponent would love to see our partnerships fall to pieces. The PPP would love to see us fail. But we cannot - we must not – fail. We need to check our proverbial compasses and make sure we are all going in the same direction.

The more of us that are moving toward this noble goal, the better our chances are of achieving success. The larger our team, the more ways there are to help get Guyana on a road to recovery.

Let’s gather all of the brainpower we can muster, and when we have done that, let’s then borrow even more brainpower, because even though we may have egos and personality conflicts, we are still all Guyanese with a vision.

Modernisation?

2005-12-04T12:36:00.000-08:00

By Peter R. Ramsaroop

This week as floodwaters converged on our streets again, one could not help but wonder why Guyana is still burdened with even the smallest of issues that most countries take for granted. The President was quick to blame the city officials for not using “his” $50M handout wisely, but he failed to tell the public why the East Coast and all the way to Berbice was also flooded, even after he spent $800M of Donors money. Donors ought to take note of this corruption and investigate where the money went. (SN Headline “Some $800M spent on flood response Thursday, June 30th 2005”

Almost daily we bombarded by propaganda of advertisement on modernisation, aired on the Government illegal station that insists there is significant progress going on in this country. The truth is more than obvious when our home or business stands in inches of water. The truth is that Guyana has made no significant advancement in decades.

True, we might have some new paved streets without traffic lights, but what good are those new streets if they are covered in water or we can’t get to them because the streets leading to them are covered in water, and when residents at the back of Tain, has no electricity or drinking water. This week’s flooding makes it more than obvious that our infrastructure is beyond just a few quick fixes. There are no engineering diagrams on the flow of the drains. Cleaning the drains does not solve the problem. Do we know if Almond Street drains in Queenstown, leads to a drain in Kitty, which then leads to another drain? What if somewhere in this system, there is no connection because a new modernised road is built over it.

Guyana needs a complete overhaul of almost every aspect of our roads, bridges, sewers, communications system and transportation system. Most times a government can simply maintain certain parts of its infrastructure, but there are also times when the old system is beyond repair and a completely new one needs to be integrated.

Our streets and sewers were state of the art systems when the British first built them. Since then, they have not been properly maintained and now fall into a state of complete disrepair. Moreover, the national infrastructure, as a whole, has aged far beyond its life expectancy and requires a complete modernisation.

At first glance it would seem the system with the most immediate need of an overhaul is the drainage system. However, I disagree. I believe the most needed overhaul is in the governmental system. We need new leadership that promotes an overarching approach to progress even more than we need a new drainage system or a bridge to Berbice.

There must be a balanced to development. Georgetown, as the capital of the country, should be a city of which every single Guyanese is proud. However, there should also be a focus on the villages that are spread throughout every part of our nation. Quick fixes are sometimes necessary but a comprehensive approach that creates a sustainable solution is far more acceptable.

The quick fixes that were supposed to have been implemented for the drainage system to prevent further flooding are in fact a miserable failure. Those in charge of maintaining this system cannot even keep the canals clean for easy water flow or ensure that the pumps do indeed have functioning fuses.

This type of incompetence is akin to an episode of the Three Stooges, but there is absolutely nothing funny about the significant loss of money each time homes and businesses are flooded. Just imagine the amount of merchandise that is completely ruined from just the first minor rain of the season.

This situation is simply unacceptable. I would never allow this type of ineptitude in my business. How much more should a governmental administration require a skilled and immediate response to any situation when thousands of people are counting on them? Since it was common knowledge that this rain was expected, a competent team would have made sure the entire drainage system was in proper working order.

It is almost as if our entire government system is just going through the motions of what they think they are suppose to do, but do not really have a clue as to what it is they should be doing. They try to say the right things and act like they are in complete control of the vital aspect of the country, but then it rains and the whole charade comes crashing down.

This is exactly the same scenario when it comes to crime, the economy and almost every other aspect running a nation. It use to be said that the PPP was a reactive government, as opposed to a proactive one, that would scuttle to fix a situation when necessary and not one second before. However, now that cannot even be said of this party since they can no longer fix the looming problems with a simple patch job after the fact.

There is no reason why Guyana cannot be as modernised and contemporary as the rest of the Caribbean. Well, actually I guess there is one reason – bad leadership. Even as a big stadium is being built to host the World Cup, there are so many other aspects of this mammoth event that Guyana is simply not prepared to handle and no steps are being taken to resolve this issues.

We have a significant shortage of hotel rooms, we have very little to offer a tourist inside the city and most importantly, the government still cannot contain the crime problem as they continue to pay the police force crumbs, while big contractors get Donor’s money to do incompetent work. Does the PPP think the criminals are just going to take a vacation while the World Cup is here? A quick reality check will show that the criminally minded will be on their worst behaviour when lots of tourists, with lots of money, come to Guyana.

The World Cup is not an occasion that the PPP can serve up a quick fix or a patch job after everything has gone wrong. This is Guyana’s chance to shine; yet we haven’t even so much as fixed the drainage system. Can you imagine how embarrassed the entire nation would be if it flooded during the World Cup?

What would we tell the world? There was a blown fuse? The canals were clogged? That our drainage system cannot handle more than 1.5 inches of rain in a 24-hour period? The President could not find his Civil Defence Staff? This whole situation is a prime example of how much Guyana needs a government with a vision for the future.

The PPP cannot pass the blame of the recent flooding onto others without accepting responsibility for its own lack of preparedness. Pushing blame on everyone else for the sad state of the country is just not believable anymore. The people are starting to see with their own eyes that the PPP does not have the ability to effectively run a country.

Modernisation is not about a 666% increases in the value of the dollar that really buy less than in 1992 when one accounts for inflation. Modernisation of a nation is about a measurable, cost effective blueprint that when put into action, integrates infrastructure, economics, political and social components to improve the lives of the people.

When election time comes around, how will the people vote? Will they vote for more floods, more crime, more poverty and more corruption? Or will they vote for progress, vision, modernisation and development? There really isn’t a choice, is there?

Crushing Corruption

2005-11-27T12:38:00.000-08:00

by Peter R. Ramsaroop

One glance at the headlines of yesterday's paper demonstrates the complete and utter frustration Guyana feels over the extensive corruption on every level of law enforcement and governmental agency. Black smoke filled the air as tyres burned with the same hot fire that burns in the hearts of those in Tain who want justice instead of corrupt law enforcement officers.

This week, BBC had a report on the ongoing corruption in Kenya . The British High Commissioner in Kenya , Sir Edward Clay, has taken a very strong stance on this issue by vocally criticising Kenya 's record on tackling corruption.

Sir Clay said he believes the foreign aid for Kenya is going into the right places, since there are safeguards to ensure the proper disbursement of the funds. The money is watched very carefully. However, he feels that in many instances the aid is simply funding what tax dollars would normally cover and those tax dollars then disappear into the pockets of corrupt government officials.

Can this be one possible explanation for how those government officials in our own country have assets that far exceed their income? There are many other possible explanations as well, such as kick back deals, bribes and payoffs. It is as if these officials think they can live above the law.

All Guyanese share the frustration expressed by the people of Tain this week. Corrupt and criminal law enforcement officers and government officials drag this nation further into a desperate whirlpool of degradation – and these are the ones we have trusted to protect us from crime and corruption. Now the question is who will protect us from them?

The Guyana Third Force (GTF) is readying itself to be a force for the people. We realise the importance of putting action to our words. This is in sharp contrast to the parties of the past who say they encourage transparency and revile corruption, but their actions – and their assets – prove otherwise.

Addressing the issue of corruption, especially of State and Government employees, will be a top priority. The law should be amended to allow the presumption of guilt to shift if it can be demonstration that an employee or state official's assets are in excess of his income.

Although we all wish it did, money does not grow on trees. Therefore, those who enter public service with a certain amount of money cannot expect to get rich in service to the people. This is even truer for a poor country.

Many of these “public servants” entered their positions with very little in way of monetary possessions. While it is true that most have maintained their official position for quite a few years now, which makes a decent salary, there is still no way most of them could purchase the houses and cars they have without “outside” funding.

If the average salary is about a few hundred US dollars a month, then how can these officials possibly afford to put up grand homes that cost around US $200,000? Even if they make US $1,000/month, there is no way they could afford these types of homes without some extra padding.

It is reprehensible that any “public servant” would get rich on the backs of his/her fellow countrymen, while the rest of the nation is trapped in a quagmire of poverty. The money being siphoned from the public through illegal means could be used to raise the overall standard of living.

In other words, the kickbacks from deals paid for by the taxpayers could easily fund so much. However, instead of a viable infrastructure, a road to Brazil , functioning traffic lights, a new sewer system, new economies in technology and non-traditional agriculture, a reduction in the poverty rate or a thriving industry in any of the upcoming new markets – instead of all of this, many officials have big houses and nice cars. What we have been saying for years finally came through. Sugar will collapse and they did not do what we had advocated for years: Diversify our economy. This failure will cost the loss of thousands of sugar workers jobs in the near future. The propaganda must stop.

So much for the PPP's communist notions. If they truly believed one word of their own propaganda, they would be living in the same conditions as the rest of the nation and the money used to build those big houses would have been used to better the economic state of the entire nation – not just the economic state of a few political elites. That does not sound like communism to me.

The GTF recommends the creation of an independent Corruption Investigation Bureau to investigate corruption in the State Sector. We propose strict sentences to be imposed on convicted corrupt officials and their assets to be seized and forfeited. These officials should also be permanently banned from Government Service and lose their pensions.

The corruption that is so rife in this nation has been a constant pain since our independence. The PPP have failed the nation by using the people as pawns for their own gain. Instead of working hard for the people, they make the people work hard for them. This twisted corruption must end with the next election.

The GTF plans to raise the standards of transparency and accountability. We plan to make our net worth public right up front, so no one can question the integrity of our political pursuit, which is a better Guyana .

We believe the salaries of all public officials should be a matter of public record and that strict conflict-of-interest guidelines should be implemented and enforced. These are necessary steps if any government wants the people to start trusting them again. Trust is an earned commodity, and right now in Guyana trust is a rare commodity.

Thanks to the PPP, it will take years to rebuild the trust of the people, but the GTF is up for the task. The slippery money that greases the greedy hands of these corrupt officials is money that belongs to the people. In the next election, it is time to make sure this money gets to where it belongs.

The black smoke that filled the sky over Tain this week represents the frustration of every single Guyanese. The empty promises of these corrupt officials rise in a spectacular display, but in the end – just like the black smoke – it dissipates into nothingness. We are long on broken promises and short on actual progress.

It is time to crush corruption once and for all in our country.

Winning Guyana's Future

2005-11-20T12:39:00.000-08:00

By Peter R. Ramsaroop

I firmly believe that the primary focus of the next elected government of Guyana should be to bring this nation into the 21st century. Without bridging the gap that exists between the technological haves and have-nots on a national level first, and secondly on an international level, Guyana will continue to fall further behind the rest of the world fiscally.

Presently, our arduous struggle to catch up in the vital areas of communications and Internet capability/accessibility has produced very few fruitful results. Relatively speaking, we are light years behind our Caribbean neighbours – a fact that is simply unacceptable.

It is unacceptable because we lack the hi-tech know-how and necessary technological infrastructure essential to function in today's information age. These components are readily available, as is evident by the implementation of such elements throughout the Caribbean , but as a country we have yet to tap into these mechanisms to even a small degree.

These are areas in which a country wants to be on the cutting edge, or even better, to be the one setting the standard and leading the way. Regretfully, Guyana hasn't the ability to act in such a capacity at present. Though we may view Internet capability and Information processes as novelties or luxuries, these features are in actuality considered essential facets of conducting even small-scale business endeavours in most of the world.

However, if a nation like India can pull itself out of economic obscurity and redefine itself as a vanguard of a whole new industry that is on the cutting edge like Outsourcing, then I truly believe that with the right amount of foresight and proper leadership, Guyana has hope to recreate itself as well.

Our nation needs a government with a vision to see the future and keep up with the progressive changes of the rest of the world so that Guyana is not constantly playing catch up. Our parliamentary seats should be filled with brave, forward thinkers, whom we can trust to fight for our interests.

It is time for Guyana to have a government that moves at the speed and effectiveness of the Information and Knowledge Age. Imagine walking into a government office today and seeing all the paper and the time consuming task of writing things five different ways. The very image of the office would communicate the obsolete and archaic characteristics of the system.

If you saw someone trying to run a government program in that office, you would know instantly it was hopeless. This situation is akin to a carpenter building a house today with a simple hammer and screwdriver instead of power tools that gets the task completed faster, easier and more efficiently.

Winning the future of Guyana will be hard work, but the Guyana Third Force is taking the initiative to roll up its sleeves and get to work. The GTF core values and contract with the people focuses on making the citizens of Guyana and their needs the focal point for determining policy.

The GTF is determined to unearth the necessary components to highlight and/or create areas of our economy that can be utilised as driving factors to stabilise our fiscal condition and then promote continual marked growth.

I believe the driving factor of any effectual government should always remain the welfare of the people. For as long as the economy continues to bottom out and crime intrudes into our very homes to steal our sense of security, we will forever be yoked to the feelings of inadequacy and eventually resign Guyana to complete failure.

The current government offers sporadic programmes that are often financed by foreign aid. Or they offer occasional indulgences, like new roads, to feign growth. However, it is what has not been accomplished that speaks volumes about the sincerity with which this government operates. In other words, it's what we do not see that proves the incompetence of this administration.

Let me put this bluntly, it has become more than obvious that the PPP does not have the resolve or the wherewithal to forge Guyana into a prosperous and flourishing nation. If they did, then we would see marked improvement instead of a continual decline in our economic status.

If the PPP had the power to create a safer nation, then we would be able to sleep at night without fear and our children could go to school without encountering sexual predators. If they had the aptitude to mature our economy, then we would have seen an influx of investors, both local and foreign, clamouring to set up business in Guyana .

If the current government had the vision to see Guyana as a thriving nation, our Diaspora would be returning in droves and welcomed with open arms. If they had the skill to employ a policy of racial diversity and national unity, our country would be working hand-in-hand toward national success instead of divided, still, by repulsive partitions of racial hate.

At this rate, our children and their children will still be stuck in the bygone era of intolerance and poverty, while the rest of the world continues on in racial synchronization and prosperity. We have to realise that while the rest of the world has moved beyond their racial issues and found ways to overcome poverty, we have stood still in time.

We have been trapped in this condition for decades and the only thing that can jolt us out of this sad situation is to change our way of thinking. We have to grow up as a nation by acknowledging our weaknesses and following the compulsory path that so many other nations have taken to success.

We need to open our eyes to the world outside of our borders and understand that we have a vital role to play in the international community. We are obligated to fulfil this role, just like every other country on Earth, though we cannot even begin to function as an international player until we can function as a viable entity on our own accord within our own borders.

Guyana is a victim of its own shortsighted selfishness. We have been so led by offence and a desire for retribution from our fellow countrymen and women that the rest of the world has passed us by in a whirlwind. I cannot stress this enough, we must lay aside our racial separation, if we ever want to see growth in our nation.
We need to realise that the responsibility for the current state of the nation lies squarely on the shoulders of the people. That is not to say the government is innocent in regard to the sorry condition of this country, but it is the people who have given them the power to pull our nation into poverty, crime and corruption.

Though we are still just an adolescent country in some regard, it is quite clear that future history is calling upon our generation to carry the burden of redefining the standards by which our country conducts its political business. The members of the GTF know and accept their responsibility to Guyana and plan to make every endeavour possible to create unity, national stability and growth.

When we all come together under this noble umbrella as one force moving in unison toward winning the future of Guyana ; that is when our nation will begin its path toward independent success - and not before.

Capitalising on the Caribbean Craze

2005-11-13T15:56:00.000-08:00

By Peter R. Ramsaroop

Guyana, a developing country, is by default a much-desired commodity in the more commercialised countries of the world. This statement might sound a bit outlandish; nonetheless, as far-fetched as it may sound, Guyana has exactly what so many big spenders earnestly desire.

The natural resources and culture of the Caribbean have become hot commodities in the Western World. It is difficult to find an urban music release that is not sporting a catchy Caribbean beat and all of the major store-chains are carrying decorative pieces made of bamboo or multiple woods. This is the music we have enjoyed since we were children and the decorations that have donned our homes in classic natural beauty.

The familiar surroundings of palm trees and bountiful flora that we take for granted is exactly the type of soothing environment hungrily sought by the rich and affluent. Even the fruit that grows in our yards and the food we cook every day is a craze for those who have some extra spending money in their pockets.

There is an incredible amount money just waiting to be poured into our country.

If we are so desirable, why is it that very few tourists actually choose to spend their money here in Guyana ? Why is it that we are not exporting more of our own products to gratify the insatiable thirst for Caribbean and South American goods? The experts say we do not know how to market Guyana .

Sometimes it feels like we're beating a dead horse when it comes to the economy. To no avail, we tell the government over and over to lighten the burden on imports and exports.

Yet another year is almost over and we find ourselves once again in the negative numbers concerning economic growth. They say they have lots of red tape and if the private sector gives them the vision, they will cut it. The rhetoric goes on and on, but at the end of the day, we are declining.

If we examine our neighbours who generally proffer the same natural resources and culture as Guyana the contrast is nothing short of shocking. For example, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) released a report in August on the economic condition of Barbados .

This report found that Barbados , which has redefined itself to be heavily dependent on tourism and financial services, is indeed thriving economically.

In fact, Barbados has the lowest poverty rate in the Caribbean and according to the IMF report, “Social indicators compare favourably in both a regional and global context; in 2004, for example, Barbados was ranked 29th among 177 countries on the United Nations Development Programme's Human Development Index.” Conversely, Guyana came in at a dismal 104.

So what is the difference between Guyana and Barbados ? Our neighbour is not without its' own economic woes. Consider this quote from the IMF report, “The economy - especially the tourism and financial services sectors - suffered a sharp recession in 2001-02 following the September 11th attacks and the global slowdown. In response to the deterioration in the external environment, the government implemented a public investment programme to help revive economic activity.”

If we examine this statement closely, the key words to note are “the government implemented.” It is clear that Barbados has a proactive government that is quick to shore up weak economic areas to limit the overall national impact and to buoy the areas producing static or promising results.

What was the result of this Bajan foresight? According to the IMF report, “A strong economic recovery appears to have taken hold in 2004. Real GDP growth in 2004 is estimated at 4.4 percent, led by a recovery in tourism, construction and communications.” It should be noted that a number of the construction projects in Barbados are vacation homes being built for foreigners.

These same foreigners will return regularly to spend their money in the Bajan economy. Of a significant note to the readers, Barbados is the size of Hogg Island , one of our over three hundred islands in Guyana .

By comparison, Guyana 's economy continues to worsen. This year's poor standings can be blamed on the flood, though we probably received more than enough foreign aid to take care of the rebuilding efforts and more.

In fact, there are probably several factors that could act as agents of blame but when we reach the bottom line it is a lack of government foresight and capable economic strategies that hold Guyana back from the same type of thriving economy that our neighbours enjoy.

The combination of ineffective, long-term policies and a severe deficiency of vision by the government continue to stifle substantive fiscal growth for Guyana .

Another one of our close neighbours is also making marked progress economically. According to a Secretariat report released in September by the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Trinidad and Tobago – with a rank of 54 on the UN Human Development survey - has capitalised on its trade capabilities and natural beauty to achieve measurable economic progress.

This report maintains that, “Since its last review in 1998, trade has played a crucial role in supporting Trinidad and Tobago 's rapid economic growth. The country's rich natural endowments, its attractiveness as an investment destination and favourable developments in world markets, especially in the hydrocarbons sector, have produced a strong increase in GDP growth and per capita income.”

These islands we are contrasting to Guyana have comparatively the same natural abilities (some we are afraid to develop internally, such as oil) and resources that we do; therefore, the difference between our flagging economy and their thriving economy can only be attributed to governance.

We have the best rum in the world, yet it gets only regional recognition in sales. Our music and culture is as rich as any other Caribbean neighbour, yet Barbados and Jamaica have artists topping the international charts.

One would be hard-pressed to find a more beautiful country than Guyana , yet billions of dollars in tourism are being spent in all of our neighbouring countries - and we get but a trickle.

It makes no sense to continue down this unproductive road. The ongoing economic decline is a direct result of an unfriendly investment climate and years of inaction in relation to the strategic planning for growth. We cannot sit on our hands and expect for progress to be delivered to our doorsteps. We have to go out and get it.

What we need is an infusion of life sparked by a sound economic strategy by the public sector that allows the private sector to be that engine of positive growth as we all talk about. It is too much to ask for a proactive government at this point, since that boat has long since sailed on that opportunity.

However, it is not too much to ask for a welcoming investment climate and open harbours and borders to stimulate the economy. Or is the government boat still tied to the dock?

If we shift our thinking and begin capitalising on our own natural resources and culture, the IMF and WTO could be writing glowing reports about Guyana too. If we do nothing, like we have been doing for decades, we will be reading about the continued progress of our neighbours and still wishing it was Guyana.

Defending our Republic – Bold Leadership needed

2005-11-06T07:10:00.000-08:00

by Peter R. Ramsaroop

Bold leadership is often a direct result of a well-defined and conscientious strategy. When a person knows the prime objective for which he/she is striving, all decisions and actions are subsequently guided by the ultimate goal of attaining this objective.

Further, when one's conscience is settled that the objective is in fact a noble effort, there is very little reason to be hesitant or apprehensive. Such a climate in Government is rare since most times leaders are unsure of how to address the relevant issues and, when that decision is finally made, doubt creeps in about the integrity of implementing the resolution.

This is why strong leadership is so difficult to find. Politicians often make compromises to retain their positions and those concessions often cause these leaders to second-guess themselves or to totally disregard their conscience in future decisions.

When this occurs repeatedly over the course of time, a leader's drive for helping others can become desensitised and, instead of a caring individual who is pursuing lofty dreams of democracy and equality, we are left with a jaded personality who is trying to hold on for dear life to any remnant of goodness.

At this point the conduct of this type of leader becomes suspect and shady activities become the rule – instead of an exception to the rule. When such a leader is reproduced over and over as a result of general expectations from party paramountcy and submission to the nastiness of party rules, an entire government can become weak “yes-men” who are incapable of effective leadership.

This is the state of the government in Guyana . This country's bold leadership has been forfeited for the sake of the party, and strong leaders have succumbed to the tantalising seduction of power and ever-present longing to be accepted by the more experienced and influential leaders.

However, experience and influence don't equate to good leadership. Likewise, bold leadership needn't be the equivalent of brash leadership. Bold leaders are capable of adhering to their convictions over party expectations. This is the type of leadership we need in Guyana .

We need bold leaders from all walks of life who are qualified and optimistic men and women with the courage of their convictions, and the vision to lead our nation to greatness. The anaemic state of the current leadership is obvious in so many ways, but it is more than obvious how faint-hearted they really are when considering the state of our national security.

In regards to the protection of our sovereignty, the current government offers the equivalent of a pathetic “boo” to chase off potential land squatters. We have seen weak leadership when it comes to protection of our borders. How embarrassing that Suriname kicked us out of our own waters while we were drilling for oil, and Venezuela limits our activities in the Essequibo Region, claiming two-thirds of our land.

Where is our strong leadership in this regard? We need a national defence team that becomes the backbone for peace. We need to stand up to any neighbour that hinders our growth.

Although narrowly not a “law enforcement” agency, the Guyana Defence Force (GDF) is vital to our country's security. Thus, this is an appropriate point at which to briefly deal with its challenges and offer solutions.

The dismantling of the GDF in recent years has rendered it incapable of protecting our citizens in time of need. In 2001 when the GDF had to deal with the CGX crisis in Suriname , they were not prepared, due to the lack of a modern force and equipment. This terrible policy error must be rectified as quickly as possible. Defence is the foundation of peace; therefore we should not neglect this major component of our national defence strategy.

Today we see our armed forces fighting crime, which indicates the breakdown of our police forces. We need the armed forces to be defending our nation and to stand against any aggression that hinders our economic growth. We need to be drilling for oil in our waters, which means we need to be drilling for oil in the Essequibo .

We must revive the soundness of our Defence Forces so they can defend the integrity of our territory, engage in humanitarian missions and react swiftly to crisis situations. The following are examples of some actions that should be taken to establish a sound national security policy:

Establish a strong militia and a military based on an extensive reservist system that can be called up at any time.
Set up an active defence force consisting or a predetermined number of soldiers as decided upon by the Parliament.
Establish permanent base camps with a battalion of troops in each camp at strategic locations to monitor our borders.
Modernise the Coast Guard for national defence purposes and to protect our exclusive fishing zones and protect our waters against the growing narco-trade.
Re-equip the Army Air Corps to provide aerial surveillance on our borders and assist in drug-interdiction operations.
Revitalise and expand an Engineer Corps to allow for participation in building homes, roads, bridges and any tasks that are deemed necessary. It is better to have a permanent skilled work force than to continue to employ expensive foreign contractors.
Revitalise the Agriculture Corps to assist in offsetting the impact of the GDF on the country's GNP and serve as a part of the training pool for youth.
Create programmes for the Army to generate revenues.
Re-establish a form of the National Service

Guyana 's problems are many and complex. Even seemingly straightforward concerns begin to seem intractable when politics become involved. Guyana needs goodwill, good laws, good men and women and good resolve.

Most of all, we need to work to truly solve our problems and replace the rule of moral chaos with that of order and direction. It is easy to propose laws. Sometimes it is easy to pass laws. But the measure of our seriousness is enforcing the law. This is where Guyana 's severe lack of strong and bold leadership becomes obvious.

Our hope does not lie in the reliance on status quo leaders who curtsey to the whims of the elite. We need leaders who have the internal fortitude to turn away from the temptations of power. We need leaders who seek national interests over personal interests. We need bold leaders who govern with compassion and wisdom. Guyana is ready for strong leadership. Are We?

Taking Charge

2005-10-30T05:59:00.000-08:00

By Peter R. Ramsaroop

The current political climate in our nation, makes it ripe for change. We, the people want change, we want it desperately, but we are still not sure what kind of change it is we want or even how to attain that change.

Historically, when the people of a nation demand change it is because they have come to a common consensus that their best interests have not been the primary consideration of the government, therefore, it is time to take matters into their own hands.

In the Feudal System during the Middle Ages, the rich and royalty lived pampered lives on the backs of the common man – who had no hope of acquiring wealth or status. No opportunity for betterment was afforded to the vassal such as education or property ownership.

Further, the fees for land usage and taxes levied against the commoners positioned them in a never-ending state of want and poverty. However, one by one the commoners of each of these countries took a unified stand against the cruelty imposed on them and demanded a judicious government and a democratic state.

What was the rallying point for the pheasants who long to escape their heavy-handed lords? They rallied together with the hope of a better life and a bright future for themselves and their children. With hope as their rallying point, sweeping change was realised throughout Europe.

Today in Europe, there are still the rich and the poor, though the chasm between these two classes is not as deep and wide as it was during the days of Feudalism. More importantly, there is also the middle class that makes up the majority of the population. This middle class is also the ruling class now and uses its vote to influence government and legislation.

Every single one of us Guyanese will acknowledge that something has to change in our nation. However, to this point we cannot seem to unify long enough to see significant change come about. If we cannot unify as one people, we will never be strong enough to usher in a better life and a bright future.

The nation’s short attention span and transient memory allows the politicians to wreak havoc on our minds by inciting incidents that hit at our weakest areas – racism and fear. We allow these twisted minds to string our emotions along and give little or no thought to the consequences of falling into their trap once again.

Will we forever be a country divided by our weaknesses? If so, we will never be strong enough to usher in the change we so desperately want and need. It is as if we never learn from our own history. We cannot continue to allow ourselves to be governed by these weaknesses.

It is time to find our strength in the commonalities we share to build a strong and cohesive force by which to demand change. We need a rallying point. The key question is what will rally our nation to stand together as one people? If we are so blind to our own history, perhaps “We Guyana”, can learn something from today’s history lesson on Feudalism.

The politically trivial and economically poor vassals of the Middle Ages found their rallying point and achieved monumental change that has benefited millions of people even to this day. These great commoners did not have power or wealth on their side, but they did have large numbers and an undying hope.

Hope is the force that will unify us as One Nation. Hope will give us the courage to cast aside our racism and fear. Hope will empower us to bind us together as One People. It will be our rallying point. When we look at our flag, we will see hope. When we sing our National anthem, we will feel hope rise up within us as we overcome our trepidation to move as a single force toward One Destiny of greatness.

With hope as its’ rallying point, “We Guyana” could rise above the petty differences and terminal weaknesses that have kept us divided and, consequently, rendered us perpetually incapable of achieving change. If we refuse to succumb to our fears, and instead allow hope to rule our actions, perhaps we will find the courage to proudly declare with a clear conscience and sincere heartfelt conviction that we are One Nation and One People with One Destiny. This is our desire. This is our dream.

Currently, our future – our destiny – looks no brighter than did the future of the pheasants of France before the French Revolution. However, after centuries of Feudalism, the masses took advantage of the precarious political climate in France to demand change – and the result was phenomenal.

Likewise, the masses of our nation should not neglect the opportunity to take advantage of the existing unsteadiness of the current dominant, and ineffective, political party. If ever there was a time to dethrone these entities – it is now. The nation’s current political climate affords us the opportunity to demand change and expect phenomenal results.

Our loathsome past hangs around our necks like a heavy weight that could drown all hope. It is time to throw off the weights of racism and fear. It is time to hope again. The commoners of old have proven that with hope as our rallying point - poverty can be eradicated and the chasm between the rich and the poor can be bridged.

Why should our taxes and the fees (bribes) required by the lords of Guyana build mansions for the “royalty” while the rest of the country lives in squalor? Our future should not be at their mercy. In fact, their future is in our hands and it is time to turn the tables of power in our nation.

Down with the lords! Down with corruption! Let the people unite with hope as their beacon. Let us march as One People - to the beat of unity - into the streets and proclaim a new era of progress and prosperity for Guyana. Long live Democracy! Long live the People in happiness and peace! We are Taking Charge.

When Governments are unprepared, victims suffer twice

2005-10-23T05:58:00.000-07:00

By Peter Ramsaroop

Hurricane Katrina is a perfect example of the consequences of an ill-prepared response system.

The citizens of New Orleans were first victims of a natural disaster, and then they were made to suffer again as victims of the government agency charged to respond to such disasters, but which unscrupulously ignored all of the warning signs of impending disaster.

The result was a great loss of precious life, homes washed away by the waters and businesses destroyed. The destruction was so complete that whole neighbourhoods were completely washed away and will never be restored to their former glory.

There are children who watched as a parent was swept away in the torrent and parents who lost their children as the hungry waves swallowed them. These people will never be the same. They will suffer physically, mentally and economically for decades to come.

All of this suffering could have been circumvented had the government seriously considered the counsel of the local officials in New Orleans who repeatedly warned of the catastrophic impact a severe hurricane could have on the city because, due to the dams and levees, it was sinking lower and lower below sea level every year.

The failure to move people out of harm's way beforehand left tens of thousands stranded in the path of a vile storm. Afterwards, the reaction time for rescuing these victims was extremely slow and, when action did finally take place, it was far too little considering the vast number of lives that were abandoned in a flooded city without food or water.

Will Guyana follow this dreadful example, or will we learn from it?

With an abundance of worldwide natural disasters this year, it would behove of every government to test their disaster preparedness strategies – that is, if they have one. Which causes one to wonder what type of strategy Guyana has for such disasters.

We haven't been short on our own natural disasters this year. We started this year with flooding and, as the year nears its end, we are dealing with even more floods. Our seawalls are failing and homes are being overcome by the waves.

And what would happen if the so-called Bird Flu does in fact evolve to the point of human transmission? If Guyana is not prepared, we could die by the thousands just like the birds all over Asia and Europe . The government does seem to be taking this situation seriously, though whether we are equipped to handle it is still to be determined.

It seems the international community at large is taking a second look at their own ability to be prepared for catastrophic events.

The US reported this week that they are even taking a second look at how well equipped they are to handle a large-scale earthquake in California . Seismologists have been forecasting a significant earthquake for some time, therefore the federal government cannot say they were not warned of impending disaster.

Further the US government cannot afford another blundered response in the face of disaster, so they are taking the necessary steps to avoid another such disastrous situation. Hurricane Katrina was a wake-up call for the US that has changed their approach to disaster preparedness.

The subsequent Hurricane Rita proved that the US had learnt their lesson and every possible measure was taken to protect the lives of those in the path of the storm.

This is the same type of proactive initiative that all countries – yes, even the smaller and poorer countries like Guyana - should employ.

After a thorough assessment of past disasters and the likelihood of future catastrophes, Guyana needs to anticipate every form of calamity, be it a natural disaster or otherwise, and take the necessary steps to ensure the ongoing safety of its citizens.

A Crisis Management Plan should be in place that can be initiated in a moment's notice should disaster strike.As is obvious from current events in Pakistan and the US , it is vital to have a plan in place that will provide a quick and tailored response for each possible calamity.

Another wise step would be to create and distribute a readiness document detailing what steps should be taken by the citizens during the most probable disasters, which in our case is most likely a significant flood.

The document should specify the dangers that should be avoided in a given situation, such as driving in moving water or being near to electrical outlets.

A list of supplies should also be included to help victims who might be stranded without access to food or water for several days.

If a family is stranded in their home and waiting for rescue, a ready supply of food and water will help assure their survival.

A solid and reliable infrastructure plays an integral role in being prepared for any disaster as well.

By shoring up our seawalls, having a sewer system that is capable of moving water quickly, and introducing a pump system that could drive the water back out of the city and residential areas, we can prepare now for the preservation of life in the unknown future.

There is no reason why an entire country should be flying by the seat of our pants when it comes to predictable disasters. Being prepared can save money on property damage, but more importantly it can save lives. A car can be replaced and a home can be rebuilt, but a life lost can never be replaced.

This is all pertinent information applicable to future preparation; however our most pressing issue right now is to help those whose homes have been damaged or destroyed by the floods. Those families need a safe place to stay until they can get their lives back together.

There are people right here in our own country who have lost everything. There are men, women and children who have no place to call home any more. Our hearts go out to these people. They are not distant victims of a ravaging storm, they are Guyanese – they are our people. We need to reach out and help them.

The numerous jaded hearts of our country sometimes find it easier to care for a distant soul in misery than to be bothered with our neighbour next door. This ought not to be. We need to take care of each other and extend a loving arm of help and aid when Guyanese are hurting.

With this in mind, I propose that we start a fund to provide assistance to the victims of this recent flooding. They will need clothes and food immediately, but long-term aid should include whatever it takes to rebuild the homes and lives of our fellow countrymen and women.

We can all give at least a small amount to help others who have lost everything. If I promise to do my part and you promise to do your part, the victims of this flood can return to their normal lives as quickly as possible.

The Choice is Ours – Do we have the Courage?

2005-10-16T05:56:00.000-07:00

by Peter R. Ramsaroop

For several decades there have been two significant forces to be reckoned with in Guyana – the PNC and the PPP.

Often with a note of indifference and very little regard for the people, these two forces have decided the fate of hundreds of thousands of Guyanese and more times than not, that outcome has been devastation and destitution. Over the same period, both parties have attempted to reform themselves but have kept reverting to their old style politics.

Can we count the number of people who fled our shores to escape poverty and daily autocratic rule? Can you remember the lives that were cut short because of racist politics? Do we remember the faces of those who died, and continue to die, at the wicked hands of rampant crime that cannot be controlled by the very ones we trust with our safety?

With each election we hope for change. We hold tightly to our optimism, so tight that our knuckles turn white, with the anticipation that maybe – just maybe - this time will be different. Maybe this time the government will do something drastic that will help our country. Maybe this time they will stop the blame game and act responsibly with their power to build a future for our nation.

We grasp at any minuscule morsel of hope these two forces have to offer and try to trust them with our lives one more time because we don't have any other choice. In the end, if one is presented with two choices that are equally vile in their own right, there really is no choice at all.

What is left for the Guyanese then? Are we to continue down this same road of poverty and death? To perform the same act over and over and expect a different outcome is nothing short of insanity. Even more, we feel we are acting honourably in this insanity because these two forces have led us to believe that we must align ourselves to one or the other and to do otherwise is betrayal of country, character and even race.

We have been led to believe our race determines our vote and any departure from this predetermined supposition is a betrayal of race – and how can one betray his/her own race? Is not the betrayal of race the same as the betrayal of self? And how can the treachery of self be noble or honourable?

This is all pure drivel. No, it is more than rubbish - it is manipulative and controlling. We long so desperately to believe that something good is going to happen someday that we are willing to listen to the calculated promises of the same forces over and over, even when we know full well that the outcome will always be the same – more desperation.

Our naivety is not noble or honourable - it is pathetic and shameful. We are not so simple that this fact escapes us, yet we continue on because there has never been another choice that seemed to be a true alternative to this wretched cyclic state. Then why have we not created an alternative?

If the product of these two dominant forces has been a wrecked country and families torn apart by thousands of miles, then why have we allowed them to continue in their roles as leaders? So they can lead us to more destitution and desperation?

People everywhere are asking about the Guyana Third Force. They want to know what it is and who it is. In practicality, there is a group of Guyanese coming together to form a solid alliance to stand up against the other two forces. However, in theory the Third Force is so much more than that.

Simply put, the Third Force is you and it is me. The only way to finally rid ourselves of this wretchedness created by these other two forces is to do it ourselves by creating a viable Third Force. We are each a part of the Third Force.

Every Guyanese who has realised the insanity of the last 40 years is a part of this Third Force. Every citizen who wants to see significant economic progress is a part of the Third Force. Every family that works long hours just to pay for after school education because of the failing school system, who cannot afford to buy a car or find a decent paying job is a part of the Third Force.

Meanwhile these long dominant forces are saying the new Third Force is no threat to them. This may well be right now, but the force grows stronger by the day as more and more Guyanese recognise that this is their chance to stand up for their country and to protect it from the same forces that have ravaged it for so long.

The Third Force is a new force that wants to turn our national naivety into an intelligent and strategic plan for growth and progress. It is not that we have given up on our dreams; we have just decided to stop waiting for the other two forces to make our dreams come true.

The Third Force is made up of Guyanese who have chosen to accept their responsibility as citizens and are decidedly moving in a direction that will reshape our future into something of which we can all be proud.

There will be some who still feel they must continue to honour that misplaced loyalty demanded by the other two forces, and this is understandable to some degree because it is hard to make the necessary mental shifts that will help them move beyond the current ideology and believe there is a better life for Guyana .

However, there are so many who have already made that shift and are biting at the bit to stand with their fellow countrymen and women to proclaim the start of a new era in Guyana.

Therefore, the real question is not who or what is the Third Force. The real question is whether enough of the nation can come together in unity to fashion a new, strong force for the good of the nation. The next question is whether you are a part of the Third Force. The other is, “Why not give ourselves a chance in 2006; simply, why not.”

Why not Guyana , the one who truly deserves our loyalty. We have the courage to move our nation forward. God Bless.

The Information We Deserve

2005-10-09T03:59:00.000-07:00

by Peter Ramsaroop

Lately there has been much ado about the privatisation of Guyana 's government-owned media.

Politicians and commentators alike are saying it is time this democratic nation finally does away with one of the last vestiges of autocratic rule that remain from the years of dictatorship.

This past week we celebrated another year of fair and free elections. There are still many items that remain untouched in our progression toward a people-centred government – one of which is the privatisation of all media.

The primary thought behind a press that has no ties or obligations to the government is that of true transparency and accountability.

Democracy demands the government to be accountable to the people who put them in office. However, the only way this can happen is if the people know the truth about what the government is doing.

A press that is beholden to the government, especially for its very life through pay cheques for the staff and the ongoing production of the news, is far less likely to point out the flaws and errors of those who pay their bills.

It stands to reason that state-run media will always be slanted in favour of the government, whether that government is deserving of that favour or not.

There are other factors to consider in our march toward democracy, for example, the sitting government will always have an unfair advantage during election times because they have ready access to numerous media outlets to deliver their campaign platform.

This advantage affords them far more opportunities for promoting their own ideas and information while the other parties must scrounge around for such opportunities.

Ideally, in a true democracy, every potential candidate has equal access to various means of letting the people know how they plan to help the country. Whether by television, paper or radio, there should be a level playing field for all candidates when campaigning for public office, regardless of financial constraints or popularity. This makes it a fair election.

If the people do not consider an election to be fair, then the person who assumes that position will not be regarded as credible or capable of carrying out his/her role as a public servant.

This is the type of situation that creates a charged political climate – something that could easily be avoided if all media were truly free and operated outside of the constraints of obligation and bias.

Government-owned media outlets will always be regarded as untrustworthy by default. It is assumed that news is filtered through a predetermined set of expectations, such as the promotion of - and never the denigration of – the government.

Letters to the editor are always suspect, the credibility of the information being provided will always be severely downplayed, and the entity takes on a superficial aura that is often scoffed at instead of respected.

In other words, the people view government media as one big advertisement for the party in power. What they want is a citizen's media where information comes from people just like them who are not opposed to being critical of the government.

It is far easier to trust a press that is not relying on a government signature to eat next week.

One could argue that, since there are other media outlets in Guyana that are indeed free, it is then acceptable to allow the government to have its own outlets. We have already demonstrated the flaw in this thought through the unfair advantage the government has when campaigning and the unreliability factor.

In short, Guyana can never expect anything negative about the government from the government – even if we have a right to know.

Therefore, we can only hold all information provided by these obligated outlets as suspect and unreliable because the government will never turn on itself.

As an aside, it is interesting to note that television stations have been shut down for operating within the context of a free press that has the ability to critique the government. This was done under the previously mentioned dictatorship, but it is highly questionable behaviour in a democratic country.

Governments within truly democratic countries do not have the right to shut down any radio or television station. The governments in these nations are criticised just as much or more than Guyana 's government, yet no such action is taken. And if it were, that government would see protests in the tens of thousands and would never find its way back to the people's hearts.

This is yet one more reason why government-owned media is so risky. Through its own outlets, the government attempts to set an industry-wide standard of no true critique.

When this standard is not met in lieu of the democratic standards, that of being a watchdog for the people, then the country is made to think such private outlets are acting as criminals, when instead they are acting in the best interest of the people.

It is wise to reflect on our history, celebrate our victories and take pride in our accomplishments. However, it should never be said that Guyana has neglected its responsibility to examine our foundational freedoms and closely inspect those areas that may still be attributed to another time when we were yoked to the will of a single individual.

Indeed, Guyana is ready to take the next step in egalitarianism by privatising those outlets owned by the government.

Though our freedom is relatively new and our economic development is only crawling along, we are well positioned to take substantial steps in the advancement of our democratic state.

Do we dare step into the next phase of freedom by expecting all media to be free? Do we really want to be just a little free? Or do we want to be encompassed on all sides and totally enveloped by freedom?

Guyana, made rich by the sunshine and lush by the rains, awaits your reply.

GuyExpo Displays Guyanese Entrepreneurial Spirit

2005-10-02T03:39:00.000-07:00

by Peter R. Ramsaroop

The GuyExpo is over for another year. The booths have been packed up, the food has all been eaten and the vendors have all gone home. There can be no doubt that this Expo was a success. The business owners of our country were on proud display – and we certainly shined. With future changes in our investment climate such as tax free zones and cutting of the red tape, we will see this exhibition flourishing with thriving small and large businesses in both the domestic and international arena.

Giving credit where credit is due, the Minister of Tourism, Trade and Commerce, Hon. Manzoor Nadir and staff should be recognised for a smoothly operated GuyExpo and for the professionalism that accompanied the entire event. The adeptness embodied by this team alone was enough to make any Guyanese proud, but there was so much more in which each of us could revel.

Families came out together in full force to support the businesses of Guyana. In return, the businesses endowed them with free paraphernalia to remember their experience. With music playing and lights dancing, we celebrated the Guyanese entrepreneurial spirit.

What was especially noticeable about this entire event was the obvious lack of racist politics. Public and private vendors, as well as the attendees, all mingled and supported one another without the usual casting of aspersions and assumptions of ill will. In fact, it was quite evident that we were there as a nation – One People, One Nation, One Destiny at least at this event.

It truly did seem as if we were actually sharing a destiny. It was as if for this brief moment in time we all understood that our futures were connected and that our lives were intertwined. Indo-Guyanese, Afro-Guyanese and Amerindians - as well as the rest of our ethnic pool - came together to display their businesses and to support others in their quest for financial success.

The event also brought businesses from the private sector in direct contact with each other, providing ample opportunities for networking. This is an important activity in such a small country because it allows the private sector to brainstorm on partnerships, bounce ideas off of each other and dream of a day when Guyana is economically stable. These rare occasions are when strategies are formed that could grow businesses, start new companies and create new jobs. This is a good example what can be achieved if we develop a broad macro and micro economic strategy for our nation what we can truly achieved.

One more very important aspect of the GuyExpo is that it brings the private sector within earshot of the public sector. Partisan politics were forgotten for just a few days as we all worked together for the good of Guyana - and it was so good. If we want to see our nation develop a strong and thriving economy, there will need to be a lot more of this type of activity and a lot less of politics as usual. We also noticed the public sector on display with supporting activities for the private sector but also saw that the public sector were also trying to compete with the private sector in areas of non-traditional agriculture sector and other government run sectors such as sugar. These are the remaining areas that must be changed immediately in order for our private sector to demonstrate that we are ready for the challenge.

All of the support and working together at this year’s GuyExpo made one point abundantly clear; we as Guyanese can easily work alongside each other without the racial politics. If the powers that be were at all intuitive, there would be a clear acknowledgment of the need to steer our government into a direction is wholly inclusive of every race and more representative of our national demography.

This event was truly insightful in many ways, but the most obvious revelation is that we are not as divided as the government would have us think. Certainly there may still be factions here and there, but the overall population works together each and every day without incident. We treat each other as equals and we respect each other as individuals – regardless of race.

There is no credible reason that our nation should still have a divided government, especially one that is divided by race. Were we divided on issues; we would be just like any other country in the world. Instead we are politically divided by race and forced to maintain this reprehensible positioning by two parties that really seem to have lost touch with the people and the fact that we have moved beyond these racial barriers in our everyday lives.

The feeling of celebration and merriment at the GuyExpo was intoxicating and long overdue for a people who incessantly struggle financially through even the most ordinary days. There needs to be additional events such as this to help boost the moral fabric of our society and to ensure that families have more places to go and spend time with their children.

This year’s GuyExpo demonstrated that when potential meets opportunity, there is a definite possibility for a dynamic reaction. The businesses of Guyana could actually feel the support of the consumers and the government. This is a notion that should continue throughout the year, especially where the government is concerned. The more businesses that are bolstered by the government, the more that will succeed and the stronger our economy will become.

However, we cannot stop at just the proffered support for national businesses. There needs to be a well-designed campaign to entice foreign investors to our shores as well. There is only so much money to pass around from one business to another in Guyana, but if we bring in money from other countries, then we all benefit from an influx of even more money.

When foreign investors come into a country, they hire locals to run the company – which means steady paying jobs for the citizens. These citizens then spend that money on utilities, food, clothes, entertainment, etc., which helps the bottom line of the national businesses. It also helps to curbs poverty and crime by cutting out the origin of these national woes – severe lack.

Guyana needs to concentrate even more on large macro foreign direct investments. Perhaps it would be a good strategy to start having an expo that would highlight foreign investors and potential foreign investors. This type of an event could pull in the serious entrepreneurs from outside of the country with the hope of keeping them around to invest into Guyana.

We should also ensure that the ever-abundant red tape that the President said he would cut is actually being slashed for national and foreign investors alike. If it is, then there are so many opportunities that are just around the corner for Guyana such as the bridge to Brazil, the new ethanol technology being provided and even possible oil reserves if the search proves to be successful.

If we can just translate the spirit of the GuyExpo into our everyday lives as consumers, businesspersons and public servants, it is clear that we have what it takes to make Guyana a country that will demand the attention of the world. The population now awaits the accountability of funds from the Expo and how and where the funds were spent.

Can we move beyond our sordid past to permanently embrace the spirit of the GuyExpo for the good of our country? Guyana, strong and proud Guyana, awaits our reply.

Taking Back Our Country!

2005-09-25T19:29:00.000-07:00

by Peter R. Ramsaroop

It seems talk of the Third Force is everywhere lately. I cannot go anywhere without being asked questions about the newly forming group. This is a very good sign because it shows that the people are still able to wrestle up enough hope and optimism from somewhere in their weary spirit to still believe in Guyana.

It also shows that Guyanese still care deeply about their country. They have not given up yet and are even willing to redefine the type of politics to which they have become accustomed with the hope that an alternative form of government can yet bring Guyana out of this arduous cycle of masochistic politics. The optimism that now fills our nation is nothing less than an indication of our dire need for change – genuine change, life-altering change.

If ever there were a people who loved their nation, this land is where they would be found. Our rich soil has undoubtedly produced the most devoted, albeit fatigued, populace that has ever walked this earth. Despite death, poverty and conniving politicians – Guyana’s spirit is still very alive and finding an outlet in so many of its citizens.

This beautiful patriotism is so stirring that it moves me beyond words. It is similar to the feeling I had when my son was first placed in my hands and I looked into his eyes and saw my own future full of faith, full of trust. This is not a feeling that can be feigned, sincerity can be read in the eyes and unmistakably the eyes of the Guyanese people are filled with expectation and hopefulness for their beloved country.

This steadfast devotion is currently moving so many to action. The fog is lifting from the minds of the Guyanese people and we are starting to see clearly what is required of us by future generations. The future demands change. And we are decisively ready to give Guyana the change it exacts from us.

Recently a marketing company undertaking research for a potential investor took a poll of about 1000 Guyanese. It is standard practice to examine the political, social and economic climate of a country before deciding whether an investment in that region would be a wise one or not. I was slipped the results of this poll and the statistics undoubtedly show just how much Guyana is ready for change.

These results were not a product of a presentation for or against any particular party, nor did the poll ask leading questions that would provoke a biased response. The questions were straightforward and the results are very interesting.

The poll showed a significant increase in support for a Third Force movement over a period of time when asked the same question, “Now if a national election was held in Guyana tomorrow, would you vote for the PPP/C, the PNC/R, a so-called Third Force, or one of the other parties”? In fact, the Third Force started out with a significant 14 percent and gradually grew to a high of 24 percent.

What makes these results even more noteworthy is the fact that the most recent part of this poll was conducted in May of this year and up until very recently the Third Force has been nothing more than prospect being considered by some hopeful patriots. Just imagine the possibilities if this movement really does get off the ground and people start to rally to the cause! The people of Guyana could finally take back our nation and build a thriving and stable society with the ability to compete on a global level in areas such as education, economics and quality of life.

It is certainly difficult not to be optimistic when considering the possibility of Guyana breaking free of the chains that hold her back from her potential. It’s is almost as if hope just starts bubbling up without notice and before you know it you are swept away in a wave of rosy anticipation.

Further, when the poll asked, “From what you have seen or heard, overall would you say you approve or disapprove of a “Third Force” in Guyana politics”? – there was a whopping 44 percent who said they would approve and 34 percent who were still unsure. This is clear indication that our population understands that we must take our nation back. Also, my gut tells me the hesitation felt by some of those polled would not be as high now as it was last May and that many would indeed now approve.

The momentum has definitely started and this thrust could very well instigate the defining movement that initiates the long awaited turnaround we have so desperately sought for decades. This is a people’s movement by a nation who seeks advancement and progress in the face of stark poverty.

My enthusiasm about the prospect of a Guyana governed with the people’s best interest as the primary focus is simply un-containable. I have a passion to see my motherland positioned to embark on a better way of life. This vision is obviously shared by many others as well. We all have a vision of a Guyana free from political intimidation, censorship, dictatorship and poverty – and this is a vision that is very close to being realised.

Perhaps it is time to call for the Third Force to start meeting with the people in their communities. It would be a sign of support for the movement and a celebration of the bright future that is knocking on Guyana’s door. This would be a demonstration of our determination to move forward after decades in the wilderness – after decades of stagnation, political fighting and racial tensions.

There can be no compromise for failure, no compromise for incompetence and no compromise for a government that does not serve the people – but instead rules the people. We are ready for a government that will drill for oil in the Essiquibo and takes care of the police and armed forces by paying them well. We have set our sights on what a new Guyana can mean for our children.

It is time for the removal of the stagnate and impotent government of our failed past. We will no long allow any Guyanese to feel marginalised or inferior. We are all brothers and sisters of Guyana regardless of race or religion.

With the mighty thunder of our voices, the resolve of our determination, the strength of our will as Guyanese, the support of our families overseas and the fervour of our young generation, we will take back our country and we will overcome. We must and we will. Guyana, our precious Guyana, awaits our triumph.

Guyana is no better today than five years ago

2005-09-18T04:55:00.000-07:00

It is standard practice in a democratic society for the people to periodically review the administration chosen to run the nation – this is election time. At that review, the administration is then either reinstated or replaced based on its performance during the time it held office.

There are several factors taken into consideration at these reviews. These factors can change from one election year to the next based on the issues the people feel are important during that point in history.

Some pertinent factors remain static, such as the financial state of the country and whether the administration was able to improve the standard of living for the people during his term. Other factors are fluid and can change at a moments notice.

For example, although George Bush cannot be re-elected as president because of term limits, his party will no doubt be judged on his performance during this current term – which includes an ongoing war and an unforeseen natural disaster that highlighted the administration’s current inability to deal with sudden catastrophic events.

The people’s assessment of day-to-day politics as well as the unforeseen events will determine whether the current political party will continue to hold office or be tossed out and replaced with another party viewed as capable of attaining the desired goals of the people, which brings us to Guyana and its current political climate.

When the question is asked, “Is Guyana better today than it was five years ago”? – what is the reply? Surely one cannot dismiss the obvious improvements such as the renovations done to the airport and the major road repairs and expansions. These are indeed significant improvements that cannot, and should not, be ignored.

However, historically the review of the government by the people has entailed a more far-reaching probe into more than just the infrastructure of the nation. To be sure, these improvements to our infrastructure were needed and long overdue. However, the sewers still overflow, there is no bridge to Berbice (as promised) and we still lack decent roads to connect the city with the hinterland areas of our nation.

Moreover, there are also far more pressing issues that have simply gone untouched under the current administration. The illiteracy rate in Guyana is an embarrassment, the educational system is deteriorating even more every year, crime is still rampant causing the people to live in relentless trepidation and, most importantly, the country is still overwhelmed in excessive poverty and corruption infiltrations almost every part of our government, law enforcement and judicial system.

These are the issues that will be considered at the next election. Will the people judge the current administration as competent and re-instate them for another term? This is a rhetorical question, in that I cannot possibly see how this could possibly occur.

Guyana does not need a government that is simply competent – she needs a government that is extraordinary. We need a government that has the ability take us from this sad state of disrepair into a crime-free, poverty-free existence.

The World Cup event, due to be hosted by Guyana in 2007, highlights an issue that demonstrates how crime and corruption in a country is directly related to the economic state of a country. The fact that our people are terrorised by criminals everyday is sad enough, but when one looks at the bigger picture, crime has an effect on the country that has far greater implications.

As mentioned in a recent KN editorial, the UN recently conducted a study that explored links between crime and development. The study said, “Africa has a serious crime problem, a key factor in its seeming inability to grow out of poverty and fully join in the global economy.” Stating that investors shun areas ravaged by violent crime, Executive Director of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, Antonio Maria-Costa, said the study showed, “African as well as foreign investors looking to put money in the developing world put their funds elsewhere, such as Asia, for fear of financial and property crime and corruption, undermining economic development.”

The study also noted, "When asked about obstacles to investment, African business leaders rank corruption highest. Corruption is also believed to be behind the large bureaucracies and endless red tape that characterise some African business environments." Another glaring piece of information said, “Africa's justice system has fewer police and judges per capita than anywhere else in the world, leading to low conviction rates so criminals remain free, and the continent is increasingly becoming a transit area for drug traffickers.”

In other words, crime and corruption prevents economic growth. With this in mind, it is no wonder Guyana, a country rife with crime and corruption, has seen no substantial or sustainable economic growth since its independence from Great Britain.

The crime and corruption that ravages our nation has a direct link to economic instability, so it is time to clean up the crime by starting with cleaning up the corruption. Once the corrupt politicians are out of the way, we will be able to clean up crime – which was many times a product of the corruption in the first place.

We need a new government with viable solutions and an implementation plan for policies and practices that will help Guyana develop into a successful and thriving country on par with its neighbours and the rest of the world.

Given the failed state of Guyana and the miserable collapse of the old system, it is quite apparent that a new systematic approach is essential to infuse the country with life and vitality. It is time to toss the old system and enable a new government to present proven methods for the recuperation of the economical, political and the social structures of our country. Though some of these methods may be new to Guyana, many are established techniques that have helped other developing countries reach their full potential – and can help our country to do the same.

We cannot shy away from these new techniques, even if they seem alien to our previously established views and customary ways of conducting business, politics, etc. Remember it is the old system that has brought us to the brink of chaos. It stands to reason that a new system can only help us recover from years of atrophy in a vegetative state as a society.

Are you ready to toss the old system and give Guyana the opportunity to flourish instead of flounder? Can you get past the years of racist politics and embrace a new way of government? Guyana, hopeful Guyana, awaits your reply.

Hope is Brimming in Guyana – New Force a People’s Movement

2005-09-11T06:25:00.000-07:00

I can see the PPP cronies shaking in their boots even as I write this column. No one can possibly deny the strength of this “Third Force” or “People’s Movement” as I call it, that has been brewing for the last few months – or the fact that so many are taking it seriously a viable means by which to fix our nation’s broken political system.

The irrefutable undercurrent of this group is sweeping the country so quickly that, despite the current administration’s attempt to pretend it doesn’t really exist, it seems Guyana may not be shackled by the “existing political evils” choice for very much longer.

The “Third Force/People’s Movement,” which must be made up of many players including political, civil and people who are looking for change - the key to the success of this movement - will make significant inroads in proving itself to be a group for the people. It is not simply an opposing force to the current administration and their failing policies, it is an opposition to status quo mentality that has crippled our country economically.

However, what must be the most disturbing aspect about this group for the two political mainstays of Guyana has got to be its racial make-up and refusal to pit one race against the other to attain (or maintain) political power.

It is not often that a small country like Guyana is afforded such a life-altering opportunity like this one. In fact, it couldn’t have come at a better time since there are already signs of the old and deadly form of election time fury sprouting up. Another very suspicious crime wave is once again instilling fear in people’s eyes and a desire for retribution in their hearts.

Oh that the nation could see how obvious this type if activity is and require the resignation of both political parties so we can start over from scratch. Surely there is not one Guyanese who is naïve enough to believe their party has clean hands. No, there is blood dripping from hands of both parties…Guyanese blood…spilt in a selfish quest for power.

If this blood was sacrificed for a bright future of unity, peace and prosperity, then perhaps one could some how justify such a loss of precious life. But each administration produces nothing but more poverty, more racial separatism and a future of little hope for our children.

Indeed, we cannot say that we are “One People” or “One Nation.” We have been torn asunder by hands stained with blood – the same hands that steer our nation! When we stand by those who are guilty, the blood is then transferred to us and we become just as guilty as the tongue that ordered the death. We cannot let it be said that we are One People of death or One Nation of blood.

We will all, most certainly, share the same destiny – but what will that destiny be? More death and blood? More poverty and hopelessness? This is the choice we must make. Unless we choose to stamp out the fire of hatred instilled in us by these dogs of death, we cannot expect to rise to a destiny of greatness.

And so here we are, presented with the opportunity to chisel a new future and a bright destiny. We finally have an out. We finally have a choice. This “Force” is our chance to take back our country and to mould a destiny of our own choosing.

Not since 1992 have we seen a concerted effort of this magnitude. Though it is still in its infancy, this Force has garnered enough support to build a noteworthy momentum. It seems the people of Guyana finally understand that it is necessary to fix the car prior to selecting a new driver – and they are ready to align themselves with a group who has the type of potential they desire.

It is high time we were given the occasion to choose a group of leaders who have proven themselves in the areas of business, community and leadership. The days of voting by race, which is nothing more than closing our eyes and pointing with the hope of picking the best eclectic oddball from a group of clueless oddities, are over.

The “Force” is bringing together the best minds of the country to work together for the good of all Guyanese. The racial barriers and preconceived notions that create factions instead of unity are for those who wish to remain in the past.

Guyana wants to move forward and it is obvious that the PPP and the PNC do not have the same objective. So the people are gladly tossing aside their misplaced alliances with stagnate politicians to embrace a new wave of political fervour spawned by righteous indignation.

More and more Guyanese are turning their faces away in disgust from the putrid politics of the present and past. Our votes cannot be bought anymore. Our hearts can no longer be provoked by words tainted with racial hatred. We refuse to lift a hand against our neighbour. Our minds will not be swayed! Listen closely, you merchants of hate – we want our country back!

This rousing transformation is changing the way we view each other and our country in general. When we take up the struggle to regain control, we also shed our tattered justifications of victimisation and embraced a new approach to life. The New Force is exactly what we needed to infuse just enough courage in us to want to hope again…to believe there is still a promising future for our beautiful nation.

Our destiny is shared, but now it is bright. Our future is dazzling because it does not have to include the current political rulers. The PPP has 15 years to prove themselves as leaders, and preaching they really need 28 years to continue to do so, because the PNC had the same. Instead they have proven that they are crooked and impotent. Now is the time to bellow it from the highest mountains of Guyana - Our future belongs to us!

This is a new day for Guyana. The sun has set on our dismal past and a brand new beautiful day dawns on our land. The sun is shining brightly and smiling down on us with pride because it knows one day very soon, one glorious and magnificent day, we will finally say Guyana is a land with “One People, One Nation, One Destiny”!

Guyana, from the crashing waters of Kaieteur Falls to the tip of the steeple atop St. George’s Cathedral, awaits to celebrate this glorious day!

Warning! Dictatorship is Creeping into Guyana!

2005-09-04T04:03:00.000-07:00

By Peter R. Ramsaroop

There have been so many free societies throughout history that have succumbed, oft times willingly, to the dictatorship of one man. We have all studied such historical events because it never makes a bit of sense why an entire country of intelligent and capable people would voluntarily lay their down rights as citizens and put themselves at the mercy of a single person.

This is a phenomenon that should be thoroughly explored by all Guyanese since we are at a crucial juncture of exactly this type of occasion in our own country.

One such example we have studied is that of the fall of the Roman Republic to Julius Caesar’s sovereign rule. This is indeed an interesting example of how a country, overwhelmed with gratitude for a long-awaited time of peace, feels so enamoured and indebted to a leader that they want to give him full reign over every aspect of the country.

In the case of Julius Caesar, he won the trust of so many in Rome that he could easily take control of various sections of government one by one without as much as an eyebrow being lifted in protest. He had the confidence of the people and, regardless of their freedom loving representatives who warned them of the dire consequences of the situation, they kept sneaking crowns on the head of Caesar’s statues to let him know they wanted him to be king.

And king is what he would become – or rather an Emperor, since that was more pleasing term in the ears of the Romans who detested tyranny and loved their Republic. However, this misplaced trust resulted in the end of the beloved Republic and the reign of Emperors until the fall of the Rome.

The situation in Guyana is very different than this Roman example in that we have not been in war with anyone but ourselves – yet there is still no peace or prosperity in Guyana. We have no reason to feel indebted to this would-be-king who has brought no reprieve from crime, poverty or racial division. In fact, our country is presently in a state of confusion and on the brink of chaos.

This is the other, more commonly used, method to sneak a dictatorship into a free country. Saddam Hussein is a modern day example of this method where fear is used to goad the people into submission to the dictatorial rule. This is a ruthless technique that silences opposition in any fashion deemed necessary and governs with a strong hand. This type of dictator also tends to be more concerned with selfish ambitions like attaining power and money than with the citizens of the country.

This is the method of dictatorship that is tiptoeing its way into Guyana. Fear is rampant and the people crave peace and prosperity. This condition, created and sustained by the very one who would-be king himself, places Guyana in a position perfect for the picking of any budding tyrant.

Our country is weak, beaten down from years of lack and lawlessness, and seeking a saviour from our incessant despair. I beg you fellow countrymen, do not turn to dictatorship for help. This is not the answer for our woes; it will just bring even more anguish into our already pathetic existence.

Some may say the political watchdogs of our country are just being oversensitive, but that is the same approach taken by the naïve citizens of Rome before they lost their freedoms forever. In fact, let us examine this subject, based on recent events, to see if one can actually draw a correlation with past dictatorships and what is now occurring in Guyana.

What are some steps taken by a latent dictator? One of the very first measures taken is to squelch the citizens’ freedom of speech. A perfect example in our own country is the silencing of Dr. Walter Rodney by previous forces of dictatorship. But a good dictator will go much farther than that. The outlets for this freedom, such as television stations and newspapers, will be targeted. These outlets will be shut down or intimidated into submission to the controlling despot.

Have we seen this sort of behaviour in Guyana recently? Yes. Overwhelmingly. A television station was shut down for speaking out against the government and newspapers, as well as citizens themselves, are being sued for voicing their opinions about the administration. I think we can safely say this step has been marked off the list for impending dictatorship.

Another step on the road to domination is to control the educational institutions. It is vital to attain the loyalty of the minds you want to dominate – especially if these minds are independent thinkers who buck the notions of tyranny. If these freethinking minds cannot be acquired, then they must be eliminated. Once again, this was a method employed by previous dictatorship when it denied Dr. Rodney, a brilliantly free mind, employment at the University of Guyana.

Another pungent modern example of this step to domination was in 1989 when the government of China, in an attempt to silence about 100,000 protesting students in Tiananmen Square, sent in the military to take care of the situation. What were the students protesting? Inequality and government corruption. They simply wanted a return to the socialist values of equality and the communist government just wanted them to shut up. The result was a death toll numbering in the thousands.

Can we see the controlling hand of a tyrant in Guyana? As a matter of a fact, just this week we were enlightened about a situation where the government chose to step in and impose a Vice-Chancellor of its own liking on UG against the protests of the University of Guyana’s wishes.

Certainly, there can be no doubt in anyone’s mind that the current administration is attempting to control the minds of the academics of Guyana with the end goal of national domination. Anyone who comes to any other conclusion is just as naïve as the Romans who forfeited their freedoms out of gratefulness – not fear.

However, there may be a portion of the population who can actually see this creeping dictatorship and view it as an opportunity to advance monetarily or to further gain political/social power. These people need to realize that dictatorship is loyal to no one as is evident in tyrants like Saddam Hussein who killed even those who were closest to him if he had the slightest inclination of disloyalty.

These are strong correlations that can be drawn from the last few months to prove that Guyana, unless she fights tooth and nail against the looming storm, is in fact on its way to another era of dictatorship under the current administration. What can be done to save her? We must speak out. Students, speak out! Mothers, speak out! Fellow countrymen, speak out! Do not allow Guyana to fall prey to the hungry eyes of tyranny. Guyana, free and liberated Guyana, awaits your reply.

Crime - The Price of Poor Governance

2005-08-28T06:19:00.000-07:00

There is always a price to pay for every decision made in life. Sometimes the payment is sweet, like when the decision is made to have a baby and the result is holding that precious bundle for the first time, and the second time, and so forth. However, sometimes our choices lead to very bad consequences – like the government's decision to be lax about the crime spree in our nation.

The result has been catastrophic for so many, and can only be expected to get worse as time progresses if drastic measures are not taken to stop the criminals. The deviant-minded are not likely to change their ways and start being upstanding citizens just because the people they are victimising cry out for mercy.

Victimisation has long been vogue in Guyana , though it is usually doled out from the hands of our leaders. This time, the victimisation is being heartily distributed by the criminals who rob, rape and murder, as well as from the leaders who have taken no significant measures to remedy the escalating situation.

If the criminals were not our own, that is our own brothers, sisters, neighbours, cousins and friends, then perhaps we would be more vigilant about demanding immediate action. And if those charged with the task of administering justice were not also in some way related or otherwise connected to the criminals, perhaps more of these thugs would be behind bars and less fear would rule the streets of our nation.

We should not forget that the victims are also our brothers, sisters, neighbours, cousins, and friends. Our lethargic approach to life in general, combined with our underlying fear of government reprisal, has put us in one of the most precarious positions we have ever experienced as an independent nation. We have become victims of our own apathy.

So what has been the cost of this crime extravaganza? Most importantly, there are the lost lives. Forget about Guyana 's brain drain for a second and think about all of the lost potential and experience embodied in the citizens who are being picked off one by one.

Another grave cost is the joy and peace of mind ripped from the women who have been raped. This horrid experience will haunt them for the rest of their lives and effect the way they interact with others in society. Fear and distrust will be the mode of operation for years to come for these women.

In fact, fear is exactly what has been instilled in all of us as a result of this recent crime wave. Our sense of security, which was already in a sad state, has all but diminished from existence – this, my friend, is the most significant cost of all.

When will enough be enough? How many people will have to die before we are outraged to the point of action? How many of the women will have to be raped? How much money will we hand over to these thieves at knifepoint before we demand that they be taken off of our streets? It is time for every single citizen of Guyana to count the cost of the crime in our nation.

To be sure, our apathy is no less a criminal act than if we went to our neighbour's house and demanded all of his money and jewellery. As English philosopher Edmund Burke once said, “It is necessary only for the good man to do nothing for evil to triumph.”

I am not suggesting a vigilante approach to law enforcement, which is just one more form of lawlessness that Guyana does not need. Our action needs to come by way of a national mandate from the citizens to the government for immediate action toward crime reduction.

Minister of Home Affairs, Gail Teixeira, said this week that she was proud that the police solve 51 percent of crime, yet no murders of business people have been solved. She told the business people to beef up internal security; the fact is we do not get killed in our office. Horrible murders and robberies make the news for a day or two, yet no one goes to trial.

If the police cannot so much as stop someone from littering or desecrating our surroundings, how will they ever be able to stop the more heinous criminals? Moreover, if we do not pay our police force more than $20,000 - 30,000 a month, how do we expect to recruit and maintain a viable force - much less stamp out the internal corruption?

The government continues to try to solve serious issues like this one with a band-aid, which shows their lack of understanding of how to run a country. Crime is directly tied to poverty and national economics. In fact, for every business-person murdered, the further we fall into the permanent grasps of the criminals.

Rather than battling the real enemies of our country, the criminals, this administration has spent more time wrestling with viable businesses over mere pettiness – business that could help our nation. Now we are at a point of desperation.

If the current government cannot clean up the streets, then it is time to get a government that can – and will. There are but a few months for this situation to turn around and for the current administration to prove itself capable of restoring order in proper fashion – that is, without the use of illegal means such as death squads. Casting a vote for an impotent government simply seals our fate to a life of crime and death.

Does anyone really think the world will come to Guyana for the World Cup if even the citizens of this country are afraid to be here? Assuredly, all over the world people are watching Guyana right now to see if we are able to host such a significant event. And be assured Mr. Jagdeo, all of Guyana is watching you to see what you will do next. Will you take the necessary steps to insure the life and liberty of your constituents? Will your administration be able to stop the violent trend of criminal activity that plagues our lives? Guyana , all of Guyana and the world, awaits your reply.

Political Intimidation, a Putrid Stench in our Democratic Nation

2005-08-21T11:20:00.000-07:00

In a true democracy, there is no question whatsoever of who is in charge – the people. The government may not like it when the people disagree with a decision the administration makes, but it is understood that the people are the boss and the government is simply an instrument by which to employ and maintain the democratic state.

As such, there is no tug-of-war for power because the government knows its place – and should it forget its place, the people are quick to send a reminder by way of the voting booth. Any power struggle that does take place in such democracies is usually between the politicians themselves, which also serves as a benefit to the constituency since this type of competition provides even more wariness of political intimidation.

However, this notion of democracy seems to have been lost in Guyana . In fact, if a citizen publicly disagrees with the government of Guyana , retribution is expected in short time. Imagine the lunacy! A person is hired for a position (the government) and when reprimanded by the boss (the people) the hireling then intimidates the boss into silence. How preposterous!

Appallingly, this is exactly the type of behaviour taking place on a daily basis in Guyana . We have businesses losing contracts because they have publicly disagreed with the government. There are publications that are either being sued or financially threatened into submission. Talk show hosts are being silenced and even letter writers to the daily newspapers are being targeted.

The government's position is clear – the citizens are not to voice their dissention. They are telling us to either shut up on our own accord or they will shut us up. How utterly repugnant! Any true child of democracy should find this type of behaviour vile and abhorrent.

The idea of free speech is a basic right in a democracy. It is the right to voice dissent against the government without fear of retribution. In other words, any citizen should be able to publicly voice their qualms about the government, specific politicians, the administration, the president and the actions of any person serving in a position paid for by the people without expecting revenge from that person or position.

This is not the case in Guyana . In fact, when one speaks out against the government here, reprisal can and should be expected. This is common knowledge. It is also a putrid stench in our democratic nation.

There is no doubt that the government of Guyana needs to be put back in its place – and quickly before even more citizens find themselves out of business, being sued for speaking out against the government - or worse. We cannot be naïve. If the people continue to allow this type of behaviour from their government, it will only lead to far worse intimidation – which is a dictatorship, not a democracy.

There are many reasons why those in power here in Guyana can use intimidation to silence the very people they are supposed to be serving. The first and foremost reason is because the people have allowed it. We are not a timid people by any means, but we have been put through the proverbial wringer politically and are prone to turning a blind eye to injustice because we feel there is no way to stop it.

Another reason the government feels it can get away with such atrocious behaviour is because it is banking on re-election, regardless of their evil ways simply because they know their constituency fears government-condoned racial violence more than they fear the loss of their businesses. Such apprehensions may not be substantiated, yet the fear exists nonetheless.

The citizens may not be happy with the actions of the reigning government, but they figure as long as they keep their mouths shut, they should be just fine. They believe they are choosing the lesser of two evils. However, this thought process could not be more wrong. Any government robbing its citizens of their freedoms should be fired. If the alternative is just as bad, then it is up to the citizens to create another viable solution – not to hand their freedoms over to corruption on a silver platter.

It is time to remind the government who the real boss is – and it is NOT THEM. We are the bosses and they serve us. If these civil servants refuse to comply, then fire them and hire a new government that will conform to democratic standards. This is how it is done in every other democratic nation and we should expect no less in our own.

We can no longer allow the government to squelch the brightest and most innovative people of our country simply because they know enough to question the wrong actions of those in office. These people are the very foundation on which our nation can prosper. The longer the government is allowed to frustrate the noble goals of Guyana 's best minds, the longer we will live in squalor and deprivation.

It is time to take back our nation by demanding a servant attitude from those we hire to run our country.

This is not a revolution spurred by violence; we have seen more than enough bloodshed in our country. This is a reformation of the mind, a rebellion of the status quo that leaves us in poverty and a revolution of a righteous spirit.

Is our spirit strong enough to stand against these assaults on our freedoms? Oh, yes it is! Truly we have been beaten down by the very ones we hired to help us, but we can rise strong and be able to extract from our government that which is expected. Furthermore, take heart, my countrymen and women, for we have democracy on our side.

These intimidators seek power, but they have no influence unless we confer it to them. Our desires are far nobler. We want justice, prosperity and true democracy without the hindrances of fear and intimidation. Such a government only impedes our quest for a better nation – as Guyanese history has proven.

Political intimidation is a crime and only the criminally-minded employ such behaviour. This is not the type of people we want running our nation and it is time to demand that justice reigns in our country instead of corruption. Sons and daughters of Guyana , will you stand up and take your place in the revolution? Will you don your amour of justice and democracy to dethrone the corruption that devastates your land? Guyana , the sweet land of your birth, awaits your reply.

A Practical Plan for Guyana’s Poverty

2005-08-14T06:13:00.000-07:00

In addressing the issue of poverty in Guyana, there seems to be a severe lack of ideas for a practical plan of action that would address the scant conditions under which so many thousands of Guyanese live every single day or to curb the progressive state of poverty in our country.

The continued state of poverty and the repercussions of this condition, such as crime and migration, are constant reminders of how the current administration is simply biding time until the next elections with the hope of hoodwinking the people into once again believing they will better the country. It is hard to believe there is even a real understanding of the issue at hand.

Case in point, the recent Executive Summary of the 2005 Poverty Reduction Strategy Progress Report (released June) stated, “Other issues presented different challenges for the Government. First, political instability exacerbated by pockets of organized and violent crime persist and must not be allowed to derail Guyana’s development agenda.”

This statement is telling of how little policy makers understand the poor. Truly, if those charged with the task of dealing with this issue grasped the meagre and humble circumstances under which the poor live - even just a tad - then they would also understand that most political instability and organized and violent crime is a direct product of poverty and can most times be curbed by simply helping those in poverty acquire respectable means by which to make a living. Yet this type of logic seems to escape the very ones who conducted these studies to examine the state of poverty in our country.

Indeed, without a comprehensive plan that speaks to this issue, Guyana has no effective development strategy at all because singling out one portion of the population for advancement while ignoring the others is counterproductive and useless. Further, if a programme is not instituted soon that would counter the effects of poverty in our rural areas, we may soon see the same type of chaos and criminal atrocities that plague sub-Saharan Africa as a result of their own extreme poverty.

It is difficult to understand the plight of the poor when one does not live in poverty. To make such an assumption is akin to a vibrant and healthy person attempting to understand the complaints of an ailing or dying person. There is simply very little possibility of identification between such drastic worlds. However, lacking the ability to identify does not morally excuse the healthy person from helping the sick. Neither are the well off excused from helping the poor. In the case of Guyana, it is also a matter of national health and evolution.

First and foremost, the poor must be given the tools needed to better their living conditions. This statement is most certainly easier said than done considering the many obstacles that hinder even the delivery of these tools, much less the continued sustainment. However, it is because of obstacles such as fear, lack of financing and apathy that poverty has grown into such a complex and persistent challenge for our country.

For example, education is the one tool that can help any person rise from poverty and stake a claim on a life of plenty. However, in agricultural communities, education often takes a backseat to farm work or a much-needed extra income as a farm labourer. This is true for children and adults alike. The need for money is constant and supersedes all other needs, including education. When this occurs from generation to generation and from house to house, the result is a community severely lacking in the most important tool that will help to fight poverty. There is no doubt that without a solid education there is no future for Guyana’s children in today’s world.

Mandatory education through secondary schooling should, of course, be standard. Enforcement of such a requirement is often tricky, especially when the parents are often willing, or at least passive, participants to delinquency. However, if the children and the country hope for a better future, school attendance must be compulsory. Access to tutoring should also be available. This is one aspect that can be provided by the community at little or no cost for implementation. Statistics show that when parents and neighbours participate in the educational process, the success rate increases exponentially. Tutors from within the community can put a personal touch on education and provide the children with a role model and constant encouragement for academic success.

Beyond secondary schools, educational centres should be established locally for career training and/or higher education. These schools will need to be highly subsidized with monies from outside the community for the first few decades to ensure early success. Education provides the necessary knowledge, and therefore empowerment, the rural areas need to assist in growth beyond agriculture alone and into the development of their own businesses outside of farming. Once the community becomes more economically independent based on new businesses established internally, it can then begin financing the schools on its own or with far less subsidies from outside the community.

Childcare is often an issue for young mothers who attempt to gain an education, thus a reliable system should be developed to help these women break the cycle of poverty. This could entail something as simple as instituting a programme that allows mothers to swap babysitting with each other during their respective class times. If the schools provide classes at multiple times, a programme like is sure to succeed.

Childcare can also be addressed if the schools budget it into operating expenses and hire childcare help from within the community. This will also provide a steady source of income for a few families in the area and help mothers who must work all day and cannot spare the time to swap babysitting.

Education is an essential element for growth and advancement; therefore we must solve the problems that prevent the poor from getting a proper education to see a change in the country’s poverty level. This is as true in the rural areas of our country as it is in the urban areas. The revitalization of these poor communities, and the dissolution of criminal acts perpetuated by poverty, depends greatly on education.

Another way to help raise the standard of living in our poor communities is by raising the standard of the housing situation. Thousands of Guyanese live in mere shacks. Here is how the Website for Habitat for Humanity Guyana describes the housing situation in our country:

In many areas, families endure leaking roofs and woefully inadequate space, with lack of privacy and sanitary facilities such as toilets or running water only the beginning of their challenges. They live in weak structures, many on the verge of collapse, with rotten walls, rusty and curled roof sheets or parts of the roof missing, and holes in the floor covered with cardboard. If windows exist, they are often covered with cardboard, zinc or wood. Families with four to 10 members frequently live in single-room houses, with either no toilet, or a toilet and kitchen outdoors.

If only a few dozen Guyanese families lived in these conditions it would be unacceptable, but the sad truth is that this description is reality for thousands of our countrymen and women.

Providing adequate housing is a huge task to undertake, yet it is one that must be addressed. Funds for such a work are not easy to come by, yet there are ways to raise the necessary funds and see significant progress. Habitat for Humanity International is a non-profit organization that helps construct houses for the poor worldwide. According to HFH, the Guyana affiliate has built 291 houses since 1995. This is the type of organization that should be at the forefront of our fight against poverty. They are always looking for volunteers to help build the next house. The more Guyanese who assist in this type of effort, the more houses that will go up and the more shacks that will fall forever.

Not everyone can spare an extra dollar to finance the construction of new homes, although there are some who can, but every single Guyanese can and should invest their time and labour to help with such a noble effort as building homes for their neighbours. This is also a great way for churches to become active members of their communities and help the poor at the same time. The obvious goal is to increase the standard of living in these poor communities and thereby increase the overall national image and well being of Guyana.

When as a country we each start taking the initiative to move beyond apathy to affect progress and reform to the stagnant cycle of poverty, we will see a true “development agenda” that will actually work for the people. Are you willing to volunteer as a tutor for a child, or to baby-sit a young mother’s child while she attends school or help build a home for your poor neighbour? Can you spare just a few hours a week for the future of your country? Do you know how vital your participation and sacrifice is to the future of your country? Yet again, Guyana expectantly awaits your reply.

A New VISION: Creating a Viable Legacy for the next Generation

2005-08-07T08:33:00.000-07:00

History is the best example of how long the human memory can be. We can sit in our comfortable homes in the 21st century AD and analyse the reign of Julius Caesar who was born in 1st century BC. We have a propensity to over-analyse with the hope of not repeating the same mistakes of those before us.

Does it do any good? If we learn from our past, yes it does a great amount of good. However, if we gaze history full in the face and comprehend the errors of our ancestors without changing, then we only waste our time in studying history.

Guyana’s children study her history every day. They are expected to know the good and the bad so they can identify with the national history that connects every citizen. But will it help them lead the country any better when it is their turn? Did our history lessons help us lead the country better than the generation before us?

I have recently been contemplating the legacy of this generation. I wonder if Guyanese 40 years from now will have a reason to show their appreciation to today’s leaders or if they will use our generation as one more excuse to justify the continuing sad state of the nation. If the latter, then it will surely be a well deserved critique.

Forty years ago Guyana was on the brink of the most potential ever to that point in history. The future held nothing but promise and we were ready to make a beautiful country with our own hands. We had a clean slate and could write our own remarkable history. Unfortunately, there has been nothing remarkable to record in the last 40 years.

Our predecessors failed us and left us with a legacy of racism, dictatorial governance and poverty. Will our legacy be the same?

The issues that plague Guyana have been analysed to death. We have debated, debunked and declared, but we are still defunct, debased and defeated in the eyes of the rest of the world. We need a new VISION.

We can use the next 40 years to build a substantial and viable legacy and leave our children a country for which they are proud. All it takes is a little initiative and a lot of hard work. There is one more very important factor needed to transform Guyana for the better – change. We must be willing to step out of our comfort zones and toss the old system in the trash heap where it belongs.

It is with this in mind that I propose a new organization to promote change and demand a new way of life for Guyana. Apathy has been our downfall. This is the first necessary change if we are to see our country develop. The change cannot be in just one or two Guyanese; it must be the entire nation – one strong voice demanding progress and reform. I have a VISION of a beautiful future.

In unity we can call for a new government, demand a healthy economy and change our country for the better. It is the only way to offer a legacy worthy of the children of Guyana. Even if no one else in the world sees our worth, we still know beyond a shadow of a doubt that we are a strong, intelligent and innovative people. We know we are capable of so much more. The untapped potential in our country is brimming at the rim and just waiting for the opportunity to bubble over into the rest of the world. We are inspired daily by this knowledge – it is what keeps us going.

A myriad of new strategies have been proposed to no avail since none have been implemented – thanks to those who have put us on this crazy merry-go-round in the first place. We go round and round. Someone says, “Stop this merry-go-round and let me off”! The leaders say, “Sure” – as they tell the technician to go even faster.

This is a strategic point in history. We can choose to end this crazy cycle or to allow our children to inherit the same legacy that was passed down to us. Quite frankly, I’m not all that happy with the legacy handed to me and would like to give my children something more valuable; I want a country full of success.

Dare I say there is a better way? It seems there have been countless attempts at creating an economic and political system that actually works for Guyana. Dare I propose a better way to infuse life into our limp economy, new techniques for a stronger infrastructure and a systematic approach at an educational system that will prepare Guyana’s children to be competitive in the career of their choosing regardless of where they live? Not only do I dare, but I ask others to help me as well.

We are Visionaries Inspiring Success In Our Nation – VISION.

The dynamics of our country are like none other in the world. We get swept away in an emotional whirlwind every time a politician yells racism. We sit idly by as the government runs our country to their liking with total disregard to what is best for us and what we want.

If we are serious about leaving a pleasing legacy for our children, then we need to start by demanding change right now. There is no more time to wait around for the government to change; they have made it abundantly clear this week that they see no reason to change at all. But you and I see the reasons every single day.

We see the squalor and the lawlessness. We see the fear in our children’s eyes when they look at the front pages of our newspapers. It is the same fear we lived with daily as we grew up. Every day our headlines scream of death, poverty and an insensitive government. I want to give the children hope and the only way that can happen is if we demand change.

When opportunity meets potential the outcome is dynamic. When an intelligent child is provided a proper education, success is the only expectation. Likewise, when a country brimming with this much potential makes its own opportunities and refuses to be held down anymore by the unseen forces of social and cultural expectation and dictatorial rule, the only outcome is success.

Will you work as a visionary for our country? Can you see the same beautiful VISION for Guyana’s future? What legacy do you want to leave the next generation? Guyana, with headlines blaring, awaits your reply.

Don't Help Us!

2005-07-24T08:27:00.000-07:00

It seems a telling sign when government seems to be more willing to publicly squelch investment attempts in Guyana than to work hand-in-hand with those who make valiant efforts to help the country’s failing economy.

There are some who have come back home at much personal sacrifice to help Guyana get on its feet. These idealistic pioneers have left family, careers and comfortable lifestyles in other countries to return to the land of their birth with hopes of helping their homeland find its place on the international economic stage.

That much sacrifice says so much alone, but what says even more is the financial investment such people have poured into Guyana. When a person invests money into an endeavour, you know they are serious. Jobs have been created, community projects have been sprouting up everywhere and the country is better for it – even if just a little bit.

These sons and daughters of Guyana are not here to shake a stern finger at the country in reprimand. They know full well how much Guyana has suffered at the hands of poverty and simply want to invest some of their own hard earned money into their motherland. They have invested millions of dollars from other countries into the local economy with no one twisting their arms to do so. They do it for the love of Guyana.

Were their intentions noble? Absolutely! They believe in their country and want to see it reach the potential we all know is there. These generous souls did not have to return, but they wanted to give something back to the country that helped them become successful.

Even if they wanted to return, just to be with family or friends, they still didn’t have to invest their own money on a large scale. They could have easily lived a comfortable lifestyle with minimal investment into the lives of other Guyanese. Yet they chose a higher road, a road that would help as many people as possible.

What has been their reward? Red tape, provided in ample amounts by the government, and public ridicule from that same government. What a sad affair! Instead of offering public support, the government tells the media that these people are clueless about their investments and didn’t know what they were doing from the start.

The result is lost jobs and a continued suppressed economy. The well-intentioned souls will now pack up shop and in the process will suffer huge financial losses, not to mention a broken spirit.

Other would-be entrepreneurs who have longed for the day when they could invest in their Guyana will now be skittish at best. Frankly, I don’t blame them one bit. Who would? This week, it seems the government has gone out of its way to chase off a native-born Guyanese investor who returned with the hope of helping his country. He has also given substantially to community projects and charities, as well as supported the growth of businesses and media.

Why on earth would anyone want to come back to invest in Guyana after watching the government take down a business before it even got off its feet? No sane and rational person would.

It is Guyana that suffers the most from these tragic events. This particular investor, and any others who have suffered the same, will bounce back. However, it is the people who will endure the worst effects of such governmental insensitivity. The jobs that were to be created are now gone, additional investment monies in the agricultural sector are now gone and future potential investors will maintain at a safe distance.

The question is why? Why is the government being so stubborn? Perhaps it’s because of political vendettas since this particular investor had a history in politics before starting his business ventures. This seems highly probable given the public spectacle they made over the denial of his certification. Or maybe it’s because they don’t want the competition in this specific area, since they do currently control all exports through their own dilapidated facility – a facility the media has yet to be allowed access.

Maybe the reason is actually the one the government has offered, that the new facility is not ready for business. If that is the case, why not allow the media to compare the two facilities and let the public see for themselves how much better the government operated facility is than the new one that was just established? That would certainly allay any notions of improprieties.

In the end though, the reasons for such government actions are not as important as the fact that the people are the ones who once again suffer. Yet again the government has effectively chased off another investor and scared off even more. The message from the government is clear – Don’t help us! Don’t pour money into Guyana. Don’t start new businesses. Don’t create new jobs. Don’t try to help our economy.

If Guyana could pull itself up by the bootstraps and thrive on its own, then it would have certainly done so by now. It’s not as if by supporting these native-born investors the country is accepting charity from foreign investors, these are our own people who want nothing but the best for Guyana.

How much longer will the people endure the actions of flighty and slanted politicians? How much longer will we wallow in self-pity and poverty while government officials sip the best wine and wear the best suits? When will enough be enough? Guyana, the promising and budding Guyana, awaits your rely.

The Must Vote in 2006: A Blueprint for Voters

2005-07-17T08:22:00.000-07:00

Choosing competent leaders has never been a strong attribute for us Guyanese. We have the best of intentions, yet something always seems to obstruct our view of the most qualified candidates until it's too late. We also have a bad habit of getting caught up in the hype of the moment every time a politician plays the race card. It's all such a blur sometimes and one can barely determine whether we are being lethargic or just hoodwinked. Either way, no one is to blame but us.

Just for fun, shall we do a test? Which leader would you choose: Machiavelli with his heavy hand and harsh words for those whom he leads? Or Plato's Philosopher King who seeks knowledge and rules with paternalistic concern over his subjects? The most obvious answer would be Plato's version of a kindly King, of course. However, if that was indeed your answer, you have chosen the wrong one.

Machiavelli is always the wrong choice for understandable reasons. Mankind has long outgrown its desire to be led by men who have nothing but their own interests at heart, and have little more than contempt and disgust for the rest of us peons who have historically laboured to the bone to quench the insatiable thirst for power and money in such leaders.

Yet, there are some who still follow the ideology of Machiavelli, though they often mask their evil intentions until they are well within the reach of obtaining their dastardly goals of power and wealth.

However, if they are truly a proper student of Machiavelli, they offer no explanation or apology for their cruel and haughty ways, since they feel they are more than entitled to the degree of adoration and fear they expect from others. Consequently, this means the humiliation and exploitation of anyone within ten feet of the wanna-be-Machiavellian when deep-seated insecurity requires the subjugation of another human being.

However, it is fairly easy to spot such a person, since they typically wear their narcissism as a badge of honour. These treacherous “leaders” tout their egocentrism as self-confidence and are generally oblivious to the spectacle they make of themselves in the process. If one is astute enough to pick up on the telltale signs of a Machiavellian, common sense alone steers us far from the destructive hands of such tyranny and would forbid us from ever casting one single vote in favour of such leadership.

Our other choice of a benevolent King who is charitable and wise, stands in sharp contrast to Machiavelli. Plato, himself a legendary philosopher, envisioned a utopian society under such a reign. How could the people desire anything more than a generous ruler? However, Plato neglected to acknowledge the one aspect of human nature that has never been quelled – the need for freedom.

Though a warm Philosopher King is most certainly more desirable than the harsh and cold Machiavelli, the human drive for freedom is stronger than any other force on the planet. So strong is this drive that fathers have sacrificed their own lives so their children could live in freedom. Men and women alike have taken up arms to fight against a foe who would rob them of their freedom. Therefore, since the title “King” implies the subjection of others, thereby requiring the recognition of the interests of one single man over the interests of the people as a whole, Plato's assertion on this issue is myopic.

Plato's short sighted position barred him from the most advantageous answer to his query of which type of ruler would be the best for the people. His approach was too simple in that it only presented an either/or solution, much like the one presented to you at the start of this column. However, there is at least one more answer availing itself upon those who seek democracy today – the right answer, the most desirable answer is neither. Neither Machiavelli nor the Philosopher King are righteous rulers since the people do not want to be ruled.

Having established this much, it is now necessary to remind the people of Guyana of one very important point – if the people do not choose the leader, they will likely end up with one of the rulers we have discussed, both of which are less than desirable. In fact, the potential outcome is a myriad of such rulers from one extreme to the other and everything in between.

With such an outcome, it is quite clear that there will be no room for a democratic leader for the people, but instead a mix of sovereigns who have either clawed their way to the top by ridding themselves of competition through any means necessary, or by slyly filing their way past the deserving leaders with the nod of head from a nepotistic royal. Either way, the people and their freedom are at grave risk.

In Guyana , we are complacent with our vote and apathetic concerning our freedom. We are docile in regards to politics to the point that our very independence is at risk.

We have created a situation ripe for a Machiavelli or Philosopher King. Indeed, some even reminisce of our monarchical days and long for the return of a benevolent King to take charge of the country and restore its former glory. This is a sad condition - that we would rather relinquish our independence than act upon our responsibilities as informed voters of a free and democratic country. Heaven forbid!

What are the guidelines by which the people should consider any leader worthy of a vote? Such guidelines differ from person to person, though there are some mainstays, a blueprint, if you will, that almost every well-informed voter employs.

Here is a set of leadership qualities to consider when deciding who will get your vote:

Competency is a must in leadership

Everyone makes mistakes, but when it comes to running a nation, it is vital to choose those who have demonstrated a clear ability to get the job done. Mistakes in government can have a long-standing impact on thousands of people. Guyana simply cannot afford any more of these kinds of mistakes.
Diplomacy is standard practice

Choose only leaders who are capable of being diplomatic and willing to work with others to accomplish the greatest good for all interested parties. There will be times when occasional issues deserve an uncompromising stance, but 99 percent of being a good leader is knowing how to be diplomatic.
A good leader has proven himself/herself in the community

Whether it is through business, academia or community service - a good leader has a proven track record for being trustworthy and accessible. One good rule of thumb is to dismiss all consideration regarding any politician caught in a compromising position. Guyana should demand only those with the highest integrity to lead our country.
A good leader knows he is a servant of the people

A good way to weed out the Machiavellians is to listen to their speeches. If they talk more about themselves than about the people they intend to serve, this is a sure way to gauge where their interests will lie once in office. Humility is a quality often in want in politicians, but good leaders have it in abundance.
A good leader knows where to place his alliance

If a leader is seeking re-election, check his/her voting record to see if party lines were more important than the best interests of the people. Never vote for those who are puppets of back room politicians.

You will also find your own important issues to add to this list as you carefully weigh the decision of who gets your vote. Please take note of one significant factor missing in the listed qualities of a good leader – race. Race is not, nor has it ever been, a determining factor for good leadership. In fact, I would go so far as to say that any leader who makes such a claim is not only a bad leader, but also a despot. Guyana, for heaven's sake, no – for your children's sake, choose your conscience over your race when electing a leader!

It is vital to the preservation of our country and our independence that we vote. By opening the door to political apathy and blind racism, we have also opened the door to Machiavellians. Your vote, and mine, can slam that door shut forever. Will you refuse power-hungry rulers their claim on your independence? How far will you go to protect your freedom?

All the way to the voting booth with your conscience intact? Fair Guyana, your Guyana, awaits your reply.

The Voice of Dissent - A true mark of democracy

2005-07-10T08:19:00.000-07:00

The health of any democratic state can be measured by the degree to which its citizens feel free to voice their dissent against the government without fear of punishment or reprisal. Guarantees of free speech, free press and free assembly mean absolutely nothing if the people live in fear of retaliation should they choose to speak their minds regarding their politicians.

Oppression comes in many shapes and sizes. It hides its evil motives in the pretences of supposed honourable acts all the while bullying the naysayer into silent submission with unspoken threats of retribution. However, let there be no doubt whatsoever that democracy requires, no demands, dissent.

Free political discussion and the right to disagree with those in political power are the cornerstone of a free country. Without the right to dissent there is no way for the people to unite in thought and purpose regarding the process that decides their lives and futures. When the people are free to discuss their feelings about the government, they have at their disposal the first platform necessary to accept or reject the government and even, if desired, replace the government.

Truly, a responsive government is simply a natural by-product of citizens who do not fear reprisal from disagreeing with their politicians. The will of the people should be the foremost concern of the government and when that will is ignored or denied, the people have a responsibility to voice their dissent and to expect changes in a timely manner.

Any element that creates a political climate that produces a fear in the people to speak their minds is anti-democratic and dictatorial. There are so many avenues by which a government can create such a climate. Some methods are more drastic than others, but the end result is always the same – silencing the voice of the people.

The more aggressive and less apologetic oppressive governments usually choose very public methods to make examples of one dissenter in an effort to curb the disapproving appetite in other would-be dissidents. These methods usually include such atrocities as shutting down a newspaper that has printed dissenting material, sending harassing messages via the media to warn its enemies and even murdering anyone who opposes the government. We have seen this type of behaviour in our dear Guyana 25 years ago when Dr. Walter Rodney was killed for voicing his dissent of the then administration.

Other less public, yet often just as sinister, methods include social ostracization, yanking of government contracts from businesses ran by political dissenters and, here in Guyana, total disregard for dissent originating from the race that is not in power. Disregarding the views of the “other” race is certainly one highly efficient technique to summarily dismiss a large amount of dissent while further perpetuating the racial division in our country - a division instigated and sustained by vitriolic politicians who would chip away at our democracy for a chance to sit in parliament.

So what is Guyana’s democratic temperature? To what degree do the citizens feel the freedom to voice their dissent? Happening upon a conversation here or there will show there is much political condemnation and the people will talk about it with their friends and acquaintances. However, there is also a noticeable undercurrent of fear that runs deep into the veins of the citizens. Whispers of dissatisfaction and low condemning murmurs consistently fill the streets, doorways and rum shops of our country and fear reigns in the place of freedom.

Perhaps this fear is a result of dreadful memories of what can happen when good men and women like Dr. Rodney speak their minds. Or maybe the fear stems from the idea that we may have a government that hires hit men to take care of its “problems.” Then again, it could be because we own a business that relies on contracts from the government and cannot afford to risk the loss of revenue in exchange for dissenting words. Sadly, the root of this underlying fear is probably all of the above – and more.

True, our newspapers are not being shut down like the papers in Iran were this past week for printing a dissenting letter. However, any element in our society that prevents dissent is a serious threat to our freedom. Even more, a society that does not actively facilitate opportunities for dissent is no patron of democracy. A country is not democratic simply because its constitution declares it to be so. There are innate principles that are foundational in the classification of being democratic – one of which is facilitation for the voice of dissent.

How does a country facilitate dissent? In today’s modern world, we have so many new avenues available for free discussion. There are Websites with forums formatted specifically for political discussion. There is also the radio, television and newspapers as a means for expressing dissent. Other avenues include providing town meetings, encouraging the formation of political activist groups and, if a situation requires drastic measures, a petition.

However, the most effectual means by which a country can facilitate dissent is to replace every unresponsive politician with one who better understands the role of a democratic leader. It really is that simple. Such politicians are not fit for the service of the people and should have no place in making decisions that impact the people if they cannot listen to the will of the people.

Further, any politician found to be making threats, even in the slightest degree, that would hamper a healthy climate of dissent, should also be replaced without delay. These leaders seek their own interest and power. They are dangerous and should not be trusted with the honour of running our country since most times this type of person will only run it into the ground and then blame it on someone else.

Beyond doubt, it is extremely difficult to overcome a fear of political reprisal when there is even a small nagging that one’s opposition might bring retribution to family, business or self. However, if the people of Guyana do not take the necessary steps to restore a healthy climate of free discussion to our country, then who will? Quite frankly my fellow compatriots, there is no one else.

With the same mouths we use to kiss our children and eat the sweet fruit of our land, we should be demanding the will of the people and declaring the freedom for political discussion. It is time to exchange our whispers for bellows and our doorways for podiums. I ask for a second time, if not us, then who? Once again, Guyana expectantly awaits your reply.

The State of Democracy in Guyana

2005-06-26T08:17:00.000-07:00

A democratic form of government is self-rule by the people through elected representatives who are to ideally enact the will of the people concerning the affairs of the country. In modern society, democracy is the noblest form of government, as well as the most precarious, because its efficaciousness relies solely on the participation of the people.

Democracy is so highly regarded because it refuses to bend a knee to the would-be tyrant or the nepotism of kings and queens. Centuries of harsh rule and maltreatment at the hands of all-powerful lords, certainly initiated and nurtured the desire for self-rule by the people. What started as a primitive form of democracy during the Greek and Roman periods has blossomed into a responsive form of government that is accountable to the people – in theory.

The precarious position of modern democracy is no doubt a direct manifestation of passivity from a people who have forgotten their past. The cruel effects of feudalism and tyranny have been so far removed from our generation that, for many democratic countries, the people no longer possess a healthy fear of what could happen if one strong personality attempt usurpation of power.

The people of our nation, who lack political interest and participation certainly beg one to question the competency of our country's democracy. We lethargically keep note of what our representatives are doing and treat their actions as superfluous and spurious, when indeed those actions are often monumental.

Who is watching the government of Guyana ? Who is maintaining a watchful eye on those who decide our fate, the fate of our children and the fate of our country? Should we just naively assume that because a person is elected or appointed to a position of power that he/she will operate responsibly by enacting the will of the people? World history has proven the contrary. Indeed, even our history has proven the contrary.

So many of us have complained that the politicians have not done their part to create a vibrant and thriving Guyana . We feel ripped off and victimized by our government for not accomplishing the tasks we have entrusted to them. Yet honesty demands that we ask ourselves the same question - have we done our part in this process?

When someone is hired for a job, the employer does not assign that person a task without intention of following up later. In fact, the employer knows that a follow-up will yield better results on the first task and even on later tasks, since the conscientious employee knows to expect the employer's critique. Yet, we the people, have not followed-up on those we have hired to fill the most important positions in our nation . We have filled these positions and simply walked away, then we return a year or two later and criticise the poor performances.

What is our part in the democratic process? Apart from voting, we are responsible to follow-up on those we hire to lead our country. We are to be the conscience of their actions, motives and agenda. We are to be informed and play an active role in carefully watching our leaders. We are to let them know when we don't approve of an action and we are to praise them for a job well done. Democracy, by definition, requires the participation of the people or it just does not, nor can it possibly, work.

Those in office are to respond to the people; not just to the people that support them or with a business in their interest, but to all people - to the common people – those who put them in the powerful positions they hold. They are accountable to the people of Georgetown, as well as to the people of Essequibo, Berbice, Sophia, Buxton - the entire country.

One might ask, “How can these politicians know what the people from these various regions expect?” The answer is easy – the politicians should ask what is expected. This is democracy in action. The politicians have no problem making the rounds during an election year, but do they truly care about the people and their interests, once they are in office? If not, it is our job to make them care, since the only reason for holding that position is to serve the people.

I do not pretend to be ignorant of the immense amount of work involved in being a conscience and active part of the democratic process. It is no small chore to keep a trained eye on those in office, yet that does not relieve us of our duty to do so. This is where the media's role in democracy becomes vital. Balanced and unbiased journalism that is free and independent of government obligation or intervention is the best way to keep the pubic informed and to maintain democracy in its purest form.

The press is to act as a watchdog for the people. Though they are certainly to watch over many parts of society, their primary responsibility is to keep a constant eye on the government. A journalist who rides the heels of politicians is to be lauded as a courier of democracy. Though the politicians may grow weary of journalists, if their intentions are pure and their actions honourable, there should be nothing to fear when a reporter starts asking questions about their job. Journalism has proven to be the most reliable follow-up method available to the people, which can and should be utilized to its fullest extent.

However, let me make this abundantly clear: any unnecessary entanglements with the press, for it to serve the people and governmental officials, are a breach of trust. Newspapers that cater to the whims of politicians to garner favour are not to be trusted, and the papers they produce are worth nothing more than to clean up after a dog. Conversely, most newspapers gladly accept their role in society and wear that responsibility as a badge of honour.

The press is only one way to stay informed. There are also many political activist groups formed with the sole purpose of watching the elected officials. The existence of these groups promotes awareness among the people and accountability by the politicians. Though these groups often hold strong notions on certain issues, their presence in the democratic system serves as a powerful deterrent for wrongdoing, because they are usually watching every move of their rival politicians, waiting expectantly for a slip up.

In the end though, it is your responsibility and mine to watch our leaders through whatever means possible. Democracy cannot work without the follow-up requiring responsiveness and accountability from those whom we have hired to run our nation. It is a beautiful human quality to expect the best from others, including our leaders, but it is simply irresponsible to entrust them to a task and not check up on them regularly. The disappointment we feel is our own fault and it is time to fix the broken aspects of democracy in Guyana, lest she fall into unsuspecting hands of cruelty.

Human ingenuity and a thirst for freedom forged modern democracy so that all people, the great and the small, have a voice in the affairs concerning themselves. Shall we treat this precious commodity with the same disregard we have toward a long forgotten stained shirt that simply occupies drawer space? Ignorance in this case is not bliss. In fact, ignorance in this case is dangerous and knowledge is our friend.

Which do you choose? Ignorance at the cost of democracy - or knowledge which will require your time? Guyana expectantly awaits your reply.

The Engaged Citizenry

2005-06-12T08:10:00.000-07:00

There comes a point in the history of every country that its citizens must take upon themselves the burden of forming a decent and upstanding nation. Ideally, this happens during the early years of development and is not lost in the growth process. However, sometimes-good intentions do get lost in the shuffle of bureaucracy and in the end the citizens are the ones who suffer the most, as they are today.

For our nation, our declaration of independence from Britain was also a declaration of well-intentioned citizenry. There were aspirations of economic, social and political expansion. With a gleam of hope in our eye, we dreamed of the many possibilities that awaited a young and aspiring country.

Somehow, in the course of time, our hope was replaced with cynicism and regret. Our sense of decency suffers constant assailment to the point of fatigue. This last few weeks with the CXC debacle, even our children were made to suffer at the hands of those who would rob them of a substantial education and position them in a place of mockery in the academic world.

Though we are still just an adolescent country, it is quite clear that future history is calling upon our generation to carry the burden of defining the standards by which our country shall thrive. Our insatiable thirst for responsive leaders has increasingly become more desperate with each year since our independence and is now culminated in a people who are disengaged, disenchanted and disheartened about their fair Guyana.

“But not in vain we’ll strive to build, a new Guyana great and free; A land of glory and of hope, A land of love and Unity.” This children’s hymn demonstrates the hope of our hearts and this hope should no longer be deferred. We can no longer relinquish the sole responsibility for the integrity and decency of Guyana to the government. It is time for each of us to play a vital role in the next stage of development lest we lose the best of the human spirit to apathy and misanthropism.

We are a free people of a democratic nation. We alone decide the political fate of our leaders and we can blame no one but ourselves for the state of Guyana. Yet each election year we fall into the same trap contrived by so-call leaders who would divide our country in their quest for political power. They recklessly cry racial partiality and our typical knee-jerk response is just as reckless. We are better than this. We are more decent and have more wisdom than to play into their dangerous games of vilifying one race over another.

How sad indeed that what started as a friendship and then a disagreement between Jagan and Burnham decades ago now divides our nation by race. These are two men who initially worked together and accomplished so much as a team. Is it possible to redeem the values that aided the establishment of our independence to now create a morally astute society poised for civic maturation? Not only is it possible, it is desirable.

In fact, we should expect the unity of our countrymen and women and stand strong as one people against the wiles of scheming politicians. We should insist on decent politicians who understand that their one purpose in office is to serve the people and gladly accept that honour and responsibility. Our primary role as engaged citizens is to require this type of responsive government, which is in sharp contrast to the reactionary government now in place that only acts when desperation requires action.

“O children of Guyana, rise, Rise up and sing with happy tears: And bless the land that gave you birth, And vow to serve her through the years.” The Hymn for Guyana’s Children calls each of us to civic participation. We are the vessels of potential in our country and our children will take this burden seriously to the degree we take it seriously. Engaged citizenry is not a trait easily caught, instead it is a learned behaviour. We teach our children by our own participation or the lack thereof.

Indeed, the government was created for the people of Guyana – not the people for the government. Upon our own shoulders lay the responsibility of decency and the opportunity for greatness. There are some who might question their obligation as citizens since Guyana has offered them no great sense of pride. That is only because Guyana itself has been offered very little for which to be proud. A strong and united people cannot help but produce a strong country, which in turns produces even more strong citizens. This cyclic relationship begins in your hands and in mine. Together, our hands can build a thriving country.

If the “Third Force” only consists of disenfranchised politicians, then it is not the answer for Guyana’s woes. Yet if it consists of participation by all of us working together, the politicians, mothers, fathers, business men and women, farmers, teachers, students, the old, the young – then this would be all Guyanese working together for the good of the country and the outcome will be spectacular.

Consider these words by Anthony Trollope concerning Guyana:

When I settle out of England, and take to the colonies for good and all, British Guiana shall be the land of my adoption. If I call it Demerara perhaps I shall be better understood. At home there are prejudices against it I know. They say it is a low, swampy, muddy strip of alluvial soil, infested with rattlesnakes, gall nippers, and mosquitoes as big as turkey-cocks; that yellow fever rages there perennially; that the heat is unendurable; that society there is as stagnant as its waters; that men always die as soon as they reach it; and when they live are such wretched creatures that life is a misfortune… There was never a land so ill spoken of - and never one that deserved it so little. All the above calumnies I contradict; and as I lived there for a fortnight – would it could have been a month! – I expect to be believed.

…For Demerara is the Elysium of the tropics – The West Indian happy valley of Rasselas – the one true and actual Utopia of the Caribbean Seas – The Transatlantic Eden.

The men in Demerara are never angry, and the women are never cross. Life flows along on a perpetual stream of love, smiles, champagne, and small talk. Everybody has enough of everything. The only persons who do not thrive are the doctors…

Though these words were published in 1860, Trollope touched on so many of the reasons why we love our country and want to see it reach its potential on the world stage. True, Guyana is often underestimated and the subject of negative conversation, but we know the capabilities of our land and our people. The only way to see this prospectus realized is by finally shedding our old habits of expecting the government alone to make something out of Guyana and doing something about it ourselves.

Our hope does not lie in the hands of the president or parliament. We are Guyana and through unity we can do what no government to date has been able to accomplish – social, economic and political stability.

“Great is the task that Thou hast given: Thy will to show, Thy truth to find: To teach ourselves that we are one, in Thy great Universal Mind.”

The Moral Fabric In Our Society

2005-06-05T08:25:00.000-07:00

The highly regarded philosopher John Stuart Mill once said, “The despotism of custom is everywhere the standing hindrance to human advancement.” Seldom has this phrase been more true than with our dear country Guyana in the last few decades. As citizens we have sat idly on the sidelines and watched as our children have become accustomed to riots in the streets and racial segregation in the government. We have simply sat by and accepted these types of incidents as being a normal course of events, when in reality they are nothing short of a national moral tragedy.

So many times good men and women have called for an end to the depressing status quo attitude that promotes the continuing unacceptable condition of our nation. I applaud the efforts of these good people. Without the courage of such individuals, truly our country would be in a far worse condition.

However, now is not the time to lose heart or shy away from the good fight to better our country and ourselves. Mill also said, “The general tendency of things throughout the world is to render mediocrity the ascendant power among mankind.” Mediocrity has long been the acceptable attitude for many Guyanese. One individual can also feel overwhelmed and like there is nothing he or she can do to change the state of our country. However, the question should not be “Should I try?” or “Why should I try?” The question each Guyanese is obliged to ask them self is “How can I not try?”

We have allowed mediocrity to rule in our hearts and as a consequence, instability has ruled our nation. Any type of growth, whether political, social or economical, has not only been stunted in the wake of our indifference, but has fallen into sad disrepair. Fortunately, all is not lost for we can still be repaired.

If the people of Guyana rise up to their moral and civic responsibilities as citizens, we can ensure a future of hope for our children and for their children. This is our country and it is time to reclaim it by asserting our responsibilities to each other as friends, neighbours, business associates and fellow countrymen.

Truly the government cannot, nor should it be expected, to carry the entire burden of building a community of hope. Each citizen shares in this obligation to the community and to the country. The most obvious obligation is of course voting and participation in the political process. However, our obligations do not stop at the voting booth.

There are children who need tutoring, teen-agers who need structured community activities and young women who need training in child development. The elderly need a caring ear, new drivers need proper instruction and vacant lots need restoration. All of these are activities that will cost little if anything for a single individual to perform.

Just think of the possibilities if a group of citizens banded together to clear a field of garbage so the youth could organize a softball team with the guidance of some adults who would volunteer their time. Now imagine that happening over and over again in multiple neighbourhoods and a league forming for competition – all with little or no out of pocket expense. The community would become stronger, the children would feel more confident in themselves and their community and the area looks better, which raises the real estate value. All of this can be the result of just a few citizens who decide to take matters into their own hands instead of waiting for the government to do something for them.

Mill’s moral theory is based on the “Greatest Happiness Principle.” He maintains that moral decisions should be made by considering the greatest amount of happiness for all those involved in the decision. In other words, when faced with the decision of mediocrity or social and political activism, the moral decision would create the greatest amount of happiness for all involved. In this case, the Greatest Happiness Principle would dictate a moral decision for activism over mediocrity.

For example, single mothers are faced with numerous issues on a daily basis. As a community, we can help these women transform themselves into productive members of society by giving them the tools needed to perform effectively in job, thereby teaching them how to support themselves and their children independent of financial aid from others. By taking the time to teach these women a trade, we are also helping our community by creating citizens who can offer a significant contribution to the community instead of needing contributions to stay alive. This is the Greatest Happiness Principle in action. This is also civic morality at its best.

Community involvement is more than charitable - it is our moral obligation. Mill stated it so eloquently, “A person may cause evil to others not only by his actions but by his inaction, and in either case he is justly accountable to them for the injury.” We have the power to turn Guyana into a viable, prosperous, and thriving country - one person at a time. If each citizen does his or her part to carry the load, we can see social reform come to our nation in a very short time.

Together, the citizens of Guyana can change the definition of what moral and civic obligations we have to each other, the community and the country at large. In time, this revamped definition will then become the moral fabric of our society, a standard by which we live and raise our children.

Instead of a nation of jaded citizens who feel exploited and abandoned by their government, we can turn the tide ourselves to ensure the health and vitality of our shared community interests through goodwill. It is time to stop waiting for the government or some other entity to come and save our communities and our country. This is a shared burden by a moral people. It’s time we saved ourselves. It’s time we saved our own country.